Suppr超能文献

股骨近端抗旋髓内钉的疗效是否优于上一代股骨近端髓内钉?

Does proximal femoral nail antirotation achieve better outcome than previous-generation proximal femoral nail?

作者信息

Baek Seung-Hoon, Baek Seunggil, Won Heejae, Yoon Jee-Wook, Jung Chul-Hee, Kim Shin-Yoon

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 41944, South Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Goodssen Hospital, Daegu 42010, South Korea.

出版信息

World J Orthop. 2020 Nov 18;11(11):483-491. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.483.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are few studies in the literature comparing the clinical outcomes and radiographic results of proximal femoral nail (PFN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for pertrochanteric femoral fracture (PFF) in elderly patients.

AIM

To evaluate both clinical and radiographic outcomes after fixation with PFN and PFNA in an elderly patient population.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-eight patients older than 65 years with PFF who underwent fixation with either PFN or PFNA were included. Seventy-three patients underwent fixation with PFN, whereas 85 were fixed with PFNA. The mean follow-up was 2.4 years (range, 1-7 years). Clinical outcome was measured in terms of operation time, postoperative function at each follow-up visit, and mortality within one year. Radiographic evaluation included reduction quality after surgery, Cleveland Index, tip-apex distance (TAD), union rate, time to union, and sliding distance of the screw or blade. Complications including nonunion, screw cutout, infection, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and implant breakage were also investigated.

RESULTS

Postoperative function was more satisfactory in patients who underwent PFNA than in those who underwent PFN ( = 0.033). Radiologically, the sliding difference was greater in PFN than in PFNA patients (6.1 and 3.2 mm, respectively, = 0.036). The rate of screw cutout was higher in the PFN group; eight for PFN (11.0%) and two for PFNA patients (2.4%, = 0.027). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, mortality rate at one year after the operation, adequacy of reduction, Cleveland Index, TAD, union rate, time to union, nonunion, infection, osteonecrosis, or implant breakage.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with PFF who underwent PFNA using a helical blade demonstrated better clinical and radiographic outcomes as measured by clinical score and sliding distance compared with patients who underwent PFN.

摘要

背景

文献中很少有研究比较老年患者股骨转子间骨折(PFF)采用股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)和股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗后的临床疗效和影像学结果。

目的

评估老年患者采用PFN和PFNA固定后的临床及影像学结果。

方法

纳入158例65岁以上的PFF患者,这些患者接受了PFN或PFNA固定。73例患者接受PFN固定,85例接受PFNA固定。平均随访时间为2.4年(范围1 - 7年)。临床疗效通过手术时间、每次随访时的术后功能以及1年内的死亡率来衡量。影像学评估包括术后复位质量、Cleveland指数、尖顶距(TAD)、愈合率、愈合时间以及螺钉或刀片的滑动距离。还调查了包括骨不连、螺钉穿出、感染、股骨头坏死和植入物断裂在内的并发症。

结果

接受PFNA治疗的患者术后功能比接受PFN治疗的患者更令人满意(P = 0.033)。在影像学方面,PFN患者的滑动差异大于PFNA患者(分别为6.1和3.2 mm,P = 0.036)。PFN组螺钉穿出率更高;PFN组有8例(11.0%),PFNA组有2例(2.4%,P = 0.027)。两组在手术时间、术后1年死亡率、复位充分性、Cleveland指数、TAD、愈合率、愈合时间、骨不连、感染、坏死或植入物断裂方面无差异。

结论

与接受PFN治疗的患者相比,采用螺旋刀片的PFNA治疗的老年PFF患者在临床评分和滑动距离方面显示出更好的临床和影像学结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adba/7672801/e3f3e88ba2b7/WJO-11-483-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验