Ge Yingbin, Gordon Mark S, Piecuch Piotr
Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
J Chem Phys. 2007 Nov 7;127(17):174106. doi: 10.1063/1.2778419.
The recently developed [P. Piecuch and M. Wloch, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 224105 (2005)] size-extensive left eigenstate completely renormalized (CR) coupled-cluster (CC) singles (S), doubles (D), and noniterative triples (T) approach, termed CR-CC(2,3) and abbreviated in this paper as CCL, is compared with the full configuration interaction (FCI) method for all possible types of single bond-breaking reactions between C, H, Si, and Cl (except H2) and the H2Si[Double Bond]SiH2 double bond-breaking reaction. The CCL method is in excellent agreement with FCI in the entire region R=1-3Re for all of the studied single bond-breaking reactions, where R and Re are the bond distance and the equilibrium bond length, respectively. The CCL method recovers the FCI results to within approximately 1 mhartree in the region R=1-3Re of the H-SiH3, H-Cl, H3Si-SiH3, Cl-CH3, H-CH3, and H3C-SiH3 bonds. The maximum errors are -2.1, 1.6, and 1.6 mhartree in the R=1-3Re region of the H3C-CH3, Cl-Cl, and H3Si-Cl bonds, respectively, while the discrepancy for the H2Si[Double Bond]SiH2 double bond-breaking reaction is 6.6 (8.5) mhartree at R=2(3)Re. CCL also predicts more accurate relative energies than the conventional CCSD and CCSD(T) approaches, and the predecessor of CR-CC(2,3) termed CR-CCSD(T).
最近开发的[P. 皮库赫和M. 沃洛奇,《化学物理杂志》123, 224105 (2005)]尺寸可扩展性左本征态完全重整化(CR)耦合簇(CC)单激发(S)、双激发(D)和非迭代三激发(T)方法,称为CR-CC(2,3),本文简称为CCL,与全组态相互作用(FCI)方法针对C、H、Si和Cl之间所有可能类型的单键断裂反应(除H₂外)以及H₂Si=SiH₂双键断裂反应进行了比较。对于所有研究的单键断裂反应,CCL方法在整个R = 1 - 3Re区域与FCI结果高度吻合,其中R和Re分别是键长和平衡键长。在H - SiH₃、H - Cl、H₃Si - SiH₃、Cl - CH₃、H - CH₃和H₃C - SiH₃键的R = 1 - 3Re区域,CCL方法将FCI结果恢复到约1毫哈特里以内。在H₃C - CH₃、Cl - Cl和H₃Si - Cl键的R = 1 - 3Re区域,最大误差分别为 -2.1、1.6和1.6毫哈特里,而对于H₂Si=SiH₂双键断裂反应,在R = 2(3)Re时差异为6.6(8.5)毫哈特里。与传统的CCSD和CCSD(T)方法以及CR-CC(2,3)的前身CR-CCSD(T)相比,CCL还能预测更准确的相对能量。