Lee J, Gupta M J, Lopes J, Pascall M A
Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Ohio State Univ., 2015 Fyffe Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
J Food Sci. 2007 Oct;72(8):M335-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00496.x.
This study investigated 2 sanitizer formulations and compared them with hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)). Formulation number 1 contained citric acid and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS). Formulation number 2 contained SDBS, citric, lactic, phosphoric acids, and benzoic acid. Low concentration levels of the sanitizers (1.0% for formulation 1 and 0.5% for formulation 2) were compared with 35% H(2)O(2) for their efficacies on Escherichia coli, Listeria innocua, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae inoculated onto low-density polyethylene (LDPE) films and metal cans at room temperature (23 +/- 1 degrees C) and 40 degrees C. The results showed that both formulations 1 and 2 required >120 s to sanitize both materials from microbial populations at room temperature, while <15 s was needed for the H(2)O(2). Except for formulation 1 on the E. coli inoculated LDPE film surface, the sanitizers completely eliminated the bacterial populations on both materials in 60 s at 40 degrees C. In general, the formulations were more effective for reduction of the microbial numbers on the can material when compared with the LDPE film. The E. coli showed greater tolerance for the sanitizers when exposed to the process conditions in this study. All sanitizers completely eliminated the test organisms in </=36 s at 40 degrees C when tested on a commercial Benco Aseptic packaging machine.
本研究调查了2种消毒剂配方,并将它们与过氧化氢(H₂O₂)进行比较。配方1含有柠檬酸和十二烷基苯磺酸钠(SDBS)。配方2含有SDBS、柠檬酸、乳酸、磷酸和苯甲酸。将低浓度的消毒剂(配方1为1.0%,配方2为0.5%)与35%的H₂O₂在室温(23±1℃)和40℃下对接种在低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)薄膜和金属罐上的大肠杆菌、无害李斯特菌和酿酒酵母的消毒效果进行了比较。结果表明,配方1和配方2在室温下对两种材料进行消毒均需要>120秒,而H₂O₂则需要<15秒。除了接种在LDPE薄膜表面的大肠杆菌上的配方1外,消毒剂在40℃下60秒内完全消除了两种材料上的细菌种群。总体而言,与LDPE薄膜相比,配方对罐材料上微生物数量的减少更有效。在本研究的工艺条件下,大肠杆菌对消毒剂的耐受性更强。在商用Benco无菌包装机上进行测试时,所有消毒剂在40℃下≤36秒内完全消除了测试生物。