Tang Peter, Imbriglia Joseph E
College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Nov;32(9):1334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.07.013.
Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) can be an effective treatment option for arthritis of the wrist, but the operation is contraindicated when there is substantial arthritis of the capitate head. We describe a new technique that involves resurfacing of the capitate when there is chondrosis by using osteochondral grafts harvested from the resected carpal bones. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients who had osteochondral resurfacing in the setting of PRC (OCRPRC) for capitate chondrosis and to determine how they compare with published results of conventional PRC.
Patients having PRC who had grade II to IV (Modified Outerbridge Scale) capitate chondrosis underwent osteochondral resurfacing of the capitate. Preoperative and postoperative pain level, employment status, range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and Mayo wrist scores were assessed, and Student's t-test was used. Postoperative Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were also calculated.
Eight patients with an average age of 53 years were followed up for 18 months. Preoperatively, 7 patients described their pain as moderate to severe; postoperatively, 7 patients described their pain as mild to no pain. Preoperative arc of motion was 84 degrees (74% of the contralateral side); postoperative arc of motion was 75 degrees (66% of the contralateral side). Preoperative grip strength was 29 kg, or 62% of the contralateral side; postoperative grip strength was 34 kg, or 71% of the contralateral side. Preoperative Mayo wrist score was 51 ("poor"); postoperative Mayo wrist score was 68 ("fair"). Average postoperative DASH score was 19.5. Follow-up radiographs showed that 75% of patients had mild to no degeneration. Magnetic resonance imaging at 21 months postoperatively showed graft incorporation. No complications were encountered.
Our results with osteochondral resurfacing compare favorably with the published results of conventional PRC in terms of pain relief, employment status, ROM, and grip strength.
近端腕骨切除术(PRC)可能是治疗腕关节关节炎的一种有效方法,但当头状骨存在严重关节炎时,该手术为禁忌。我们描述了一种新技术,即在存在软骨软化时,通过使用从切除的腕骨获取的骨软骨移植物对头状骨进行表面置换。本研究的目的是评估因头状骨软骨软化而接受PRC联合骨软骨表面置换术(OCRPRC)的患者的治疗效果,并确定其与已发表的传统PRC结果相比如何。
接受PRC且头状骨软骨软化分级为II至IV级(改良Outerbridge量表)的患者接受头状骨的骨软骨表面置换。评估术前和术后的疼痛程度、就业状况、活动范围(ROM)、握力和梅奥腕关节评分,并使用学生t检验。还计算了术后手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分。
8例平均年龄53岁的患者随访了18个月。术前,7例患者将疼痛描述为中度至重度;术后,7例患者将疼痛描述为轻度至无疼痛。术前活动弧度为84度(对侧的74%);术后活动弧度为75度(对侧的66%)。术前握力为29kg,即对侧的62%;术后握力为34kg,即对侧的71%。术前梅奥腕关节评分为51分(“差”);术后梅奥腕关节评分为68分(“一般”)。术后平均DASH评分为19.5。随访X线片显示75%的患者有轻度至无退变。术后21个月的磁共振成像显示移植物融合。未发生并发症。
我们的骨软骨表面置换术在疼痛缓解、就业状况、ROM和握力方面的结果与已发表的传统PRC结果相比具有优势。