Suppr超能文献

使用带或不带导丝的心导管针:穿刺后血管壁的病理评估

Use of angiographic needles with or without stylets: pathologic assessment of vessel walls after puncture.

作者信息

Frood L R, Smith D C, Pappas J M, Elvin P K, Westengard J C, Saukel G W

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA 92354.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1991 May;2(2):269-72. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(91)72293-8.

Abstract

There is controversy as to whether angiographic needles without stylets produce more arterial damage than those with stylets. Iliac arteries from 15 fresh human cadavers were punctured 56 times with either an 18-gauge angiographic needle with a stylet or one without a stylet (28 punctures with each needle type). These puncture sites were serially sectioned and examined microscopically. Each needle tract was evaluated for margin irregularity, shape of puncture, and approximation of edges. No statistically significant differences in arterial wall changes were found. The authors' data suggest that the choice of beveled needle use in angiography can probably be made on a basis other than concern for differences in vessel wall damage secondary to the presence or absence of a stylet.

摘要

关于不带针芯的血管造影针是否比带针芯的血管造影针造成更多动脉损伤存在争议。使用18号带针芯的血管造影针或不带针芯的血管造影针对15具新鲜人类尸体的髂动脉进行了56次穿刺(每种针型各穿刺28次)。对这些穿刺部位进行连续切片并进行显微镜检查。对每个针道评估边缘不规则性、穿刺形状和边缘接近度。未发现动脉壁变化有统计学显著差异。作者的数据表明,血管造影中斜面针的选择可能基于除担心针芯存在与否导致血管壁损伤差异之外的其他因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验