Waska Robert
Private Psychoanalytic Practice, PO Box 2769, San Anselmo, Ca 94979 USA.
Bull Menninger Clin. 2007 Summer;71(3):187-203. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2007.71.3.187.
In the psychoanalytic setting, patients can develop a strong reaction to the therapeutic opportunity to gain new knowledge about themselves. This reaction to knowledge is manifested in the patient by walling it off, splitting it off, or attacking it and erasing it from one's internal experience. The avoidance of knowledge can be the result of various phantasy states that bring on defensive postures. Knowledge can be experienced as a persecutory threat to be avoided and defended against. Knowledge can also elicit depressive concerns of loss and separation. Issues of dependence and autonomy can be equated with knowledge and therefore learning must be warded off. As a result of any or all of these internal threats, the ego can instigate a moratorium on thinking and creativity, a shutdown on feeling, thinking, and learning. As will be shown in the case material, wanting to know can be offset by a greater defensive need to not know. Through projective identification cycles, knowledge is placed into the analyst and experienced as dangerous, unobtainable, or a gift one deserves to be given rather than earned. The patient in the case example demonstrates a more paranoid experience of knowledge and a more paranoid avoidance of learning and change. When paranoid phantasies drive the patient to destroy object-relational links between self and analyst, the transference becomes colored with the phantasy of knowledge being equal to dangerous dependence that leads to destruction of either self or object. Therefore, curiosity and learning are to be avoided. Change is no longer a safe option. Psychic change can only occur when past and current knowledge are allowed to be part of the ego's self<-->object world. In other words, Psychic change is possible when the ego is less restrictive and open to new self<-->object experience. Therefore, the ego must tolerate conflicted feelings and thoughts about the self and others for knowledge to be allowable and accessible. This is the core struggle for many patients and must be identified through interpretation of transference and phantasy for gradual working through to become a viable possibility.
在精神分析情境中,患者可能会对获得关于自身新知识的治疗契机产生强烈反应。这种对知识的反应在患者身上表现为将其隔离、分裂出去,或者对其进行攻击并从自身内在体验中抹去。对知识的回避可能是由各种引发防御姿态的幻想状态导致的。知识可能被体验为一种需要回避和抵御的迫害性威胁。知识也可能引发关于失落和分离的抑郁性担忧。依赖和自主问题可能与知识等同起来,因此学习必须被抵制。由于这些内在威胁中的任何一个或全部,自我可能会促使思维和创造力暂停,情感、思维和学习停止。正如案例材料中将展示的那样,求知欲可能会被更强烈的不想知道的防御需求所抵消。通过投射性认同循环,知识被投射到分析师身上,并被体验为危险的、无法获得的,或者是应得而非通过努力获得的礼物。案例中的患者展现出对知识更偏执的体验,以及对学习和改变更偏执的回避。当偏执幻想驱使患者破坏自我与分析师之间的客体关系联系时,移情就会被知识等同于危险依赖从而导致自我或客体毁灭的幻想所影响。因此,好奇心和学习都应被避免。改变不再是一个安全的选择。只有当过去和当前的知识被允许成为自我客体世界的一部分时,心理改变才会发生。换句话说,当自我限制较少且对新的自我客体体验持开放态度时,心理改变才有可能。因此,自我必须容忍关于自我和他人的矛盾情感和想法,知识才会被允许且可获取。这是许多患者的核心挣扎所在,必须通过对移情和幻想的解释来识别,以便逐步解决,使其成为一种可行的可能性。