Kim Sung-Han, Choi Su-Jin, Kim Hong-Bin, Kim Nam-Joong, Oh Myoung-Don, Choe Kang-Won
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Youngun-dong, Chongro-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 12;167(20):2255-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.20.2255.
Diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis (E-TB) remains a challenge. A recently developed Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific region of difference 1 gene-based assay for diagnosing tuberculosis infection showed promising results. However, the diagnostic usefulness of this assay remains to be determined compared with tuberculin skin test (TST) in patients with suspected E-TB in clinical practice.
All patients with suspected E-TB were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary care hospital during a 9-month period. In addition to the conventional tests for diagnosing E-TB, the interferon gamma-producing T-cell responses to early secreted antigenic target 6 and culture filtrate protein 10 by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay were performed. Final diagnosis in patients having suspected E-TB was classified by clinical category.
Seventy-two patients with suspected E-TB were enrolled; 34 (47%) had immunosuppressive conditions. Of 72 patients, 32 (44%) were classified as having E-TB, including 22 with confirmed tuberculosis and 10 with probable tuberculosis, and 35 (49%) were classified as not having tuberculosis. The remaining 5 (7%) had possible tuberculosis and were excluded from the final analysis. Chronic caseating granulomas, acid-fast bacilli stain, M tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction, and cultures for M tuberculosis were positive in 22 (69%), 5 (16%), 15 (47%), and 18 (56%), respectively, of 32 patients with E-TB. The sensitivity and specificity of the TST (induration size, > or =10 mm) were 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-65%) and 86% (95% CI, 70%-95%), respectively. By comparison, the sensitivity and specificity of the ELISPOT assay were 94% (95% CI, 79%-99%; P < .001 between TST and ELISPOT) and 88% (95% CI, 72%-97%; P =.99 between TST and ELISPOT), respectively.
The ELISPOT assay is a useful adjunct test for diagnosing E-TB.
诊断肺外结核病(E-TB)仍然是一项挑战。最近开发的一种基于结核分枝杆菌特异性差异区域1基因的结核病感染诊断检测方法显示出了有前景的结果。然而,在临床实践中,与结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)相比,该检测方法的诊断效用仍有待确定。
在一家三级护理医院的9个月期间,前瞻性纳入所有疑似E-TB的患者。除了用于诊断E-TB的常规检测外,还通过酶联免疫斑点(ELISPOT)检测法检测了对早期分泌抗原靶点6和培养滤液蛋白10产生干扰素γ的T细胞反应。疑似E-TB患者的最终诊断按临床分类进行。
纳入72例疑似E-TB患者;34例(47%)有免疫抑制情况。72例患者中,32例(44%)被分类为患有E-TB,包括22例确诊结核病和10例可能患有结核病,35例(49%)被分类为未患结核病。其余5例(7%)可能患有结核病,被排除在最终分析之外。32例E-TB患者中,慢性干酪样肉芽肿、抗酸杆菌染色、结核分枝杆菌聚合酶链反应及结核分枝杆菌培养的阳性率分别为22例(69%)、5例(16%)、15例(47%)和18例(56%)。TST(硬结大小≥10 mm)的敏感性和特异性分别为47%(95%置信区间[CI],29%-65%)和86%(95% CI,70%-95%)。相比之下,ELISPOT检测法的敏感性和特异性分别为94%(95% CI,79%-99%;TST与ELISPOT之间P<.001)和88%(95% CI,72%-97%;TST与ELISPOT之间P =.99)。
ELISPOT检测法是诊断E-TB的一种有用的辅助检测方法。