Bensalah K, Lotan Y, Karam J A, Shariat S F
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(2):112-20. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4501026. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
The introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) revolutionized prostate cancer (PCa) screening and ushered the PSA era. However, its use as a screening tool remains controversial and changes in the epidemiology of PCa have strongly limited its prognostic role. Therefore, we need novel approaches to improve our ability to detect PCa and foretell the course of the disease. To improve the specificity of total PSA, several approaches based on PSA derivatives have been investigated such as age-specific values, PSA density (PSAD), PSAD of the transition zone, PSA velocity and assessment of various isoforms of PSA. With recent advances in biotechnology such as high-throughput molecular analyses, many potential blood biomarkers have been identified and are currently under investigation. Given the plethora of candidate PCa biomarkers, we have chosen to discuss a select group of candidate blood-based biomarkers including human glandular kallikrein, early prostate cancer antigens, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and its binding proteins (IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3), urokinase plasminogen activation system, transforming growth factor-beta1, interleukin-6, chromogranin A, prostate secretory protein, prostate-specific membrane antigen, PCa-specific autoantibodies and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase. While these and other markers have shown promise in early phase studies, no single biomarker is likely to have the appropriate degree of certainty to dictate treatment decisions. Consequently, the future of cancer prognosis may rely on small panels of markers that can accurately predict PCa presence, stage, metastasis, and serve as prognosticators, targets and/or surrogate end points of disease progression and response to therapy.
前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的引入彻底改变了前列腺癌(PCa)的筛查方式,开启了PSA时代。然而,将其用作筛查工具仍存在争议,且PCa流行病学的变化极大地限制了其预后作用。因此,我们需要新的方法来提高检测PCa和预测疾病进程的能力。为提高总PSA的特异性,人们研究了多种基于PSA衍生物的方法,如年龄特异性值、PSA密度(PSAD)、移行带PSAD、PSA速度以及对PSA各种异构体的评估。随着高通量分子分析等生物技术的最新进展,许多潜在的血液生物标志物已被识别,目前正在研究中。鉴于候选PCa生物标志物众多,我们选择讨论一组精选的候选血液生物标志物,包括人腺体激肽释放酶、早期前列腺癌抗原、胰岛素样生长因子-I(IGF-I)及其结合蛋白(IGFBP-2和IGFBP-3)、尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活系统、转化生长因子-β1、白细胞介素-6、嗜铬粒蛋白A、前列腺分泌蛋白、前列腺特异性膜抗原、PCa特异性自身抗体和α-甲基酰基辅酶A消旋酶。虽然这些及其他标志物在早期研究中已显示出前景,但没有单一生物标志物可能具有足够的确定性来指导治疗决策。因此,癌症预后的未来可能依赖于能够准确预测PCa的存在、分期、转移,并作为疾病进展和治疗反应的预后指标、靶点和/或替代终点的小生物标志物组合。