Suppr超能文献

铁的耐受性:双甘氨酸亚铁II与硫酸亚铁的比较

Tolerability of iron: a comparison of bis-glycino iron II and ferrous sulfate.

作者信息

Coplin M, Schuette S, Leichtmann G, Lashner B

机构信息

University of Chicago Clinical Nutrition Research Center, Illinois.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1991 Sep-Oct;13(5):606-12.

PMID:1799918
Abstract

The tolerability of supplemental iron in the chelated form of bis-glycino iron II was compared with that of ferrous sulfate in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial. Both iron formulations were prepared to deliver 50 mg elemental iron in each capsule; the capsules for both formulations were identical in appearance and weight. Each supplement was taken once daily before breakfast for two weeks. The incidence and severity of adverse side effects were not statistically different for the two preparations. However, of the 38 women evaluated, 14 (37%) experienced moderate-to-severe side effects only while taking the sulfate formulation compared to eight (21%) who experienced similar side effects only while taking the chelate formulation; the remaining 16 women had the same symptom profile with both preparations. This tendency for the chelate to be better tolerated was observed for the symptoms of bloating, constipation, and nausea. In addition, a significant (P less than 0.05) number of women preferred the chelate to the sulfate formulation. This preference appeared to be related to the lower number of side effects experienced with the chelate.

摘要

在一项随机、双盲、交叉试验中,对双甘氨酸亚铁螯合形式的补充铁剂与硫酸亚铁的耐受性进行了比较。两种铁制剂均制成每粒胶囊含50毫克元素铁的形式;两种制剂的胶囊在外观和重量上相同。每种补充剂每天早餐前服用一次,共服用两周。两种制剂的不良副作用发生率和严重程度在统计学上无差异。然而,在接受评估的38名女性中,14名(37%)仅在服用硫酸制剂时出现中度至重度副作用,而8名(21%)仅在服用螯合制剂时出现类似副作用;其余16名女性在两种制剂下症状相同。对于腹胀、便秘和恶心症状,观察到螯合制剂耐受性更好的趋势。此外,相当数量(P小于0.05)的女性更喜欢螯合制剂而非硫酸制剂。这种偏好似乎与螯合制剂副作用较少有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验