Waters Allison M, Craske Michelle G, Bergman R Lindsey, Treanor Michael
School of Psychology, Griffith University (Gold Coast Campus), PMB 50 Gold Coast Mail Centre, Queensland, Australia.
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Jan;46(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Oct 7.
The present study examined threat interpretation biases in children 7-12 years of age with separation, social and generalised anxiety disorders (N=15), non-anxious offspring at risk due to parental anxiety (N=16) and non-anxious controls of non-anxious parents (N=14). Children provided interpretations of ambiguous situations to assess cognitive, emotional and behavioural responses. In comparison with non-anxious control children and at-risk children who did not differ from each other, anxious children reported stronger negative emotion and less ability to influence ambiguous situations. These results suggest that threat interpretation bias may be a cognitive factor associated with ongoing childhood anxiety but not a vulnerability factor associated with parental anxiety.
本研究调查了7至12岁患有分离焦虑症、社交焦虑症和广泛性焦虑症的儿童(N = 15)、因父母焦虑而有风险的非焦虑后代(N = 16)以及父母无焦虑的非焦虑对照组儿童(N = 14)的威胁解释偏差。儿童对模糊情境进行解释,以评估认知、情绪和行为反应。与彼此无差异的非焦虑对照组儿童和有风险儿童相比,焦虑儿童报告的负面情绪更强,影响模糊情境的能力更低。这些结果表明,威胁解释偏差可能是与儿童期持续焦虑相关的认知因素,而不是与父母焦虑相关的易感性因素。