Cervellione Raimondo M, Bianchi Adrian, Fishwick Janet, Gaskell Sarah L, Dickson Alan P
Department of Paediatric Urology, Central Manchester University Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):304-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
We assessed the results from a single exstrophy center of salvage continence surgery after failed staged reconstruction for bladder exstrophy.
A total of 32 patients with bladder exstrophy had undergone salvage continence procedures. Indications for surgery included incontinence due to poor bladder capacity or failed bladder neck repair, and upper tract deterioration. Continence was defined according to the International Children's Continence Society as continent, intermittently incontinent and continuously incontinent.
A total of 29 patients (91%) are continent, 3 (9%) are intermittently incontinent and none is continuously incontinent. One patient is continent after bladder augmentation and urethral clean intermittent catheterization. Two patients are continent and 1 is intermittently incontinent after bladder augmentation and modified Young-Dees bladder neck repair using urethral clean intermittent catheterization. One patient is continent using clean intermittent catheterization through a continent cutaneous diversion into a bladder substitution. A total of 19 patients are continent after bladder neck closure, bladder augmentation and continent cutaneous diversion using clean intermittent catheterization. Four patients are continent after cutaneous urinary diversion. Two are continent and 2 are intermittently incontinent after a Mainz II pouch.
The majority of patients can still achieve continence following failed staged repair. Patients who have a low bladder leak pressure and who tolerate urethral catheterization can be consistently dry with bladder augmentation and bladder neck repair, which is a viable alternative to bladder neck closure, bladder augmentation and continent cutaneous diversion. Cutaneous urinary diversion has a role in selected patients. Mainz II pouch has not yielded consistent results. With better patient selection and increasing experience within specialist exstrophy centers fewer patients should require salvage continent surgery in the future.
我们评估了一家单一的膀胱外翻修复失败后进行挽救性控尿手术的膀胱外翻治疗中心的治疗结果。
共有32例膀胱外翻患者接受了挽救性控尿手术。手术指征包括膀胱容量小或膀胱颈修复失败导致的尿失禁以及上尿路恶化。根据国际儿童尿控协会的标准,尿控情况分为完全控尿、间歇性尿失禁和持续性尿失禁。
共有29例患者(91%)完全控尿,3例(9%)间歇性尿失禁,无持续性尿失禁患者。1例患者在膀胱扩大术和尿道清洁间歇性导尿后实现控尿。2例患者在膀胱扩大术和改良Young-Dees膀胱颈修复术并采用尿道清洁间歇性导尿后实现控尿,1例间歇性尿失禁。1例患者通过可控性皮肤造口转流至膀胱替代物并采用清洁间歇性导尿实现控尿。共有19例患者在膀胱颈闭合、膀胱扩大术和可控性皮肤造口转流并采用清洁间歇性导尿后实现控尿。4例患者在皮肤尿流改道后实现控尿。2例患者在 Mainz II 袋手术后实现控尿,2例间歇性尿失禁。
大多数患者在分期修复失败后仍可实现控尿。膀胱漏压低且能耐受尿道导尿的患者通过膀胱扩大术和膀胱颈修复术可始终保持干爽,这是膀胱颈闭合、膀胱扩大术和可控性皮肤造口转流的可行替代方案。皮肤尿流改道在部分患者中发挥作用。Mainz II 袋手术效果不一。随着患者选择的改善以及专科膀胱外翻治疗中心经验的增加,未来需要进行挽救性控尿手术的患者应会减少。