Nanigian Dana K, Kurzrock Eric A
Department of Urology, Children's Hospital, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.161. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
The Malone antegrade continence enema procedure revolutionized the surgical management of fecal incontinence. Open and laparoscopic antegrade continence enemas are often performed with cecoplication and mesenteric manipulation. Since our initial laparoscopic antegrade continence enema description, we have simplified our technique. We present our series of laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedures, discuss technique and outcomes, and review the literature.
We retrospectively reviewed children who underwent laparoscopic antegrade continence enema between 2001 and 2007. Outcome measures included operative time, length of stay, stomal complications and resolution of incontinence or constipation. Using an umbilical port and 1 to 2 additional ports, the appendix was mobilized to allow transposition to the umbilicus. No cecoplication was performed. The appendix was not straightened unless catheterization was difficult.
A total of 22 patients (mean age 7.8 years) underwent laparoscopic antegrade continence enema. Of the patients 21 were discharged home on postoperative day 1. Mean operative time was 65 minutes (range 30 to 116). In the last 10 patients only 1 working port was used. No perioperative complications were encountered. Mean followup was 24 months (range 1 to 68). Constipation and fecal incontinence resolved in all cases. No patient experienced stomal complications. One obese patient with kyphosis could not pass the catheter beyond the mid appendix at 1 month postoperatively. She had the same problem 1 month following open antegrade continence enema with cecoplication.
Laparoscopic antegrade continence enema is an effective means of treating intractable fecal incontinence and constipation. Our technique of using in situ appendix without cecoplication requires minimal mobilization and manipulation of the blood supply. Secondary ischemia, adhesions and scar formation are reduced, alleviating the most common complication, stomal stenosis. Our results show that cecoplication is not necessary to maintain stomal continence.
马龙顺行性可控灌肠术彻底改变了大便失禁的外科治疗方法。开放式和顺行性可控灌肠术通常与盲肠折叠术和肠系膜操作一起进行。自从我们首次描述腹腔镜顺行性可控灌肠术以来,我们简化了技术。我们展示了我们的一系列腹腔镜顺行性可控灌肠术病例,讨论了技术和结果,并回顾了相关文献。
我们回顾性分析了2001年至2007年间接受腹腔镜顺行性可控灌肠术的儿童。观察指标包括手术时间、住院时间、造口并发症以及失禁或便秘的缓解情况。通过脐部端口和1至2个额外端口,游离阑尾以使其能够移位至脐部。未进行盲肠折叠术。除非插管困难,否则阑尾不进行伸直处理。
共有22例患者(平均年龄7.8岁)接受了腹腔镜顺行性可控灌肠术。其中21例患者在术后第1天出院。平均手术时间为65分钟(范围30至116分钟)。在最后10例患者中仅使用了1个操作端口。未发生围手术期并发症。平均随访时间为24个月(范围1至68个月)。所有病例的便秘和大便失禁均得到缓解。没有患者出现造口并发症。1例肥胖且患有脊柱后凸的患者在术后1个月时无法将导管通过阑尾中部。她在接受开放式顺行性可控灌肠术并进行盲肠折叠术后1个月也出现了同样的问题。
腹腔镜顺行性可控灌肠术是治疗顽固性大便失禁和便秘的有效方法。我们使用原位阑尾且不进行盲肠折叠术的技术所需的血供游离和操作极少。继发性缺血、粘连和瘢痕形成减少,减轻了最常见的并发症——造口狭窄。我们的结果表明,为保持造口可控性,盲肠折叠术并非必要。