Buchanan A, Weiss K M
Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Soc Biol. 1991 Fall-Winter;38(3-4):233-41.
Published infant mortality rates (IMR's) for Mexican-American populations frequently are lower than expected given the socioeconomic status (SES) of these populations. It has been speculated that this is due to bias or incompleteness in Mexican-American vital statistics. In this paper an extensive genealogical data base constructed from Catholic church records and civil records for the border city of Laredo, Texas is used to study this problem. The infant mortality probabilities (IMP's) since 1950 are compared to conventional IMR's, both based strictly on the population at risk defined by baptisms, in which the deaths are a proper subset of the denominator, and these are compared with IMR's calculated in the usual way from aggregate civil records of births and infant deaths for Laredo. We find that when these data are used, the IMR's for the most recent years are about twice the conventional rates computed from registered vital statistics.
就墨西哥裔美国人的社会经济地位(SES)而言,已公布的该群体婴儿死亡率(IMR)往往低于预期。据推测,这是由于墨西哥裔美国人生命统计数据存在偏差或不完整。在本文中,我们利用从得克萨斯州边境城市拉雷多的天主教会记录和民事记录构建的一个广泛的家谱数据库来研究这个问题。自1950年以来的婴儿死亡概率(IMP)与传统的IMR进行了比较,两者都严格基于受洗定义的风险人群,其中死亡人数是分母的一个适当子集,并且将这些与从拉雷多出生和婴儿死亡的综合民事记录中以通常方式计算的IMR进行比较。我们发现,当使用这些数据时,最近几年的IMR约为根据登记生命统计数据计算的传统比率的两倍。