Schmitt M, Goretzki L, Jänicke F, Calvete J, Eulitz M, Kobayashi H, Chucholowski N, Graeff H
Frauenklinik, Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, FRG.
Biomed Biochim Acta. 1991;50(4-6):731-41.
Tumor cell invasion and metastasis is a multifactorial process, which at each step may require the action of proteolytic enzymes such as collagenases, cathepsins, plasmin, or plasminogen activators. An enzymatically inactive proenzyme form of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (pro-uPA) is secreted by tumor cells which may be converted to an enzymatically active two-chain uPA-molecule (HMW-uPA) by plasmin-like enzymes. Action of proteases on pro-uPA may generate the enzymatically active or inactive high-molecular-weight form of uPA (HMW-uPA). Some proteases (plasmin, cathepsin B and L, kallikrein, trypsin or thermolysin) activate pro-uPA by cleaving the peptide bond Lys158 and IIe159. Other proteases (elastase, thrombin) cleave pro-uPA at different positions to yield enzymatically inactive HMW-uPA. HMW-uPA may be split into the enzymatically active LMW-uPA and the enzymatically inactive ATF (amino terminal fragment). ATF may be cleaved between peptide sequence 20 and 40 within the receptor binding domain of uPA (GFD). Such impaired ATF does not bind to uPA-receptors. Action of the bacterial endoproteinase Asp-N from Pseudomonas fragi mutant on pro-uPA or HMW-uPA, however, generates intact ATF which efficiently competes for binding of HMW-uPA or pro-uPA to receptors on tumor cells. High uPA-antigen content (pro-uPA, HMW-uPA, or LMW-uPA) in breast cancer tissue (not in plasma) indicates an elevated risk for the patient of recurrences and shorter overall survival. Thus pro-uPA/uPA-antigen content in breast cancer tissue serves as an independent prognostic parameter for the outcome of the disease. Cathepsin D is also an independent prognostic factor for recurrences and overall survival. High content of cathepsin D in breast cancer tumors is, however, not correlated with elevated levels of pro-uPA/uPA indicating that synthesis and release of cathepsin D and pro-uPA/uPA are independent events.
肿瘤细胞侵袭和转移是一个多因素过程,在每个步骤中可能都需要蛋白水解酶的作用,如胶原酶、组织蛋白酶、纤溶酶或纤溶酶原激活剂。肿瘤细胞分泌尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(pro-uPA)的无酶活性的酶原形式,其可被类纤溶酶转化为具有酶活性的双链uPA分子(HMW-uPA)。蛋白酶对pro-uPA的作用可能产生酶活性或无活性的高分子量形式的uPA(HMW-uPA)。一些蛋白酶(纤溶酶、组织蛋白酶B和L、激肽释放酶、胰蛋白酶或嗜热菌蛋白酶)通过切割肽键Lys158和Ile159来激活pro-uPA。其他蛋白酶(弹性蛋白酶、凝血酶)在不同位置切割pro-uPA以产生无酶活性的HMW-uPA。HMW-uPA可被裂解为具有酶活性的LMW-uPA和无酶活性的ATF(氨基末端片段)。ATF可在uPA受体结合域(GFD)内的肽序列20和40之间被切割。这种受损的ATF不与uPA受体结合。然而,来自脆弱拟杆菌突变体的细菌内蛋白酶Asp-N对pro-uPA或HMW-uPA的作用产生完整的ATF,其可有效竞争HMW-uPA或pro-uPA与肿瘤细胞上受体的结合。乳腺癌组织(而非血浆)中高uPA抗原含量(pro-uPA、HMW-uPA或LMW-uPA)表明患者复发风险增加且总生存期缩短。因此,乳腺癌组织中的pro-uPA/uPA抗原含量可作为该疾病预后的独立预测参数。组织蛋白酶D也是复发和总生存期的独立预测因素。然而,乳腺癌肿瘤中组织蛋白酶D的高含量与pro-uPA/uPA水平升高无关,表明组织蛋白酶D和pro-uPA/uPA的合成与释放是独立事件。