Gerber L M, Goerres G, Uebelhart D, Suter P M
Medizinische Poliklinik, Universitätsspital Zürich.
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2007 Oct 31;96(44):1717-25. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157.96.44.1717.
During the last few years bioimpedance analysis (BIA) devices have been heavily promoted for body composition measurements in daily medical practice. The accuracy of these devices is not exactly known. Accordingly we compared in this study 6 different BIA devices, 3 different skinfold callipers with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference methodology. The correlation coefficient between the fat mass assessed by the BIA devices as compared to the DXA methodology varied between r = 0.880 and r = 0.947 (p for all < 0.001). The accuracy of the measurements was better in women than in men and better in individuals with a BMI > 25 kg/m2 than in individuals with a BMI < 25 kg/m2. For daily use the BIA devices are much more user-friendly than the skinfold callipers. It is obvious that the use of the BIA measurement in daily practice does not help much in the assessment of obesity but more so in the assessment (quantification) of the lean body mass (LBM).
在过去几年中,生物电阻抗分析(BIA)设备在日常医疗实践中被大力推广用于身体成分测量。这些设备的准确性尚不完全清楚。因此,在本研究中,我们将6种不同的BIA设备、3种不同的皮褶厚度测量仪与双能X线吸收法(DXA)作为参考方法进行了比较。与DXA方法相比,BIA设备评估的脂肪量之间的相关系数在r = 0.880至r = 0.947之间变化(所有p值均<0.001)。测量的准确性在女性中比在男性中更好,在BMI>25 kg/m²的个体中比在BMI<25 kg/m²的个体中更好。对于日常使用,BIA设备比皮褶厚度测量仪更便于用户使用。很明显,在日常实践中使用BIA测量对肥胖评估帮助不大,但对瘦体重(LBM)的评估(量化)更有帮助。