Williams Shuntae, Saha Lipi, Singha Ujjal K, Chaudhuri Minu
Department of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immune Response, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Boulevard, Nashville, TN 37208, USA.
Exp Parasitol. 2008 Mar;118(3):420-33. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.10.008. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
Trypanosome alternative oxidase (TAO) and the cytochrome oxidase (COX) are two developmentally regulated terminal oxidases of the mitochondrial electron transport chain in Trypanosoma brucei. Here, we have compared the import of TAO and cytochrome oxidase subunit IV (COIV), two stage-specific nuclear encoded mitochondrial proteins, into the bloodstream and procyclic form mitochondria of T. brucei to understand the import processes in two different developmental stages. Under in vitro conditions TAO and COIV were imported and processed into isolated mitochondria from both the bloodstream and procyclic forms. With mitochondria isolated from the procyclic form, the import of TAO and COIV was dependent on the mitochondrial inner membrane potential (delta psi) and required protein(s) on the outer membrane. Import of these proteins also depended on the presence of both internal and external ATP. However, import of TAO and COIV into isolated mitochondria from the bloodstream form was not inhibited after the mitochondrial delta psi was dissipated by valinomycin, CCCP, or valinomycin and oligomycin in combination. In contrast, import of these proteins into bloodstream mitochondria was abolished after the hydrolysis of ATP by apyrase or removal of the ATP and ATP-generating system, suggesting that import is dependent on the presence of external ATP. Together, these data suggest that nuclear encoded proteins such as TAO and COIV are imported in the mitochondria of the bloodstream and the procyclic forms via different mechanism. Differential import conditions of nuclear encoded mitochondrial proteins of T. brucei possibly help it to adapt to different life forms.
锥虫交替氧化酶(TAO)和细胞色素氧化酶(COX)是布氏锥虫线粒体电子传递链中两个受发育调控的末端氧化酶。在此,我们比较了TAO和细胞色素氧化酶亚基IV(COIV)这两种阶段特异性核编码线粒体蛋白导入布氏锥虫血流形式和前循环形式线粒体的过程,以了解这两个不同发育阶段的导入过程。在体外条件下,TAO和COIV被导入并加工进入来自血流形式和前循环形式的分离线粒体。对于从前循环形式分离的线粒体,TAO和COIV的导入依赖于线粒体内膜电位(Δψ),并且需要外膜上的蛋白质。这些蛋白质的导入还依赖于内部和外部ATP的存在。然而,在用缬氨霉素、CCCP或缬氨霉素与寡霉素联合处理使线粒体Δψ消散后,TAO和COIV导入来自血流形式的分离线粒体并未受到抑制。相反,在用腺苷三磷酸双磷酸酶水解ATP或去除ATP及ATP生成系统后,这些蛋白质导入血流线粒体的过程被消除,这表明导入依赖于外部ATP的存在。总之,这些数据表明,诸如TAO和COIV等核编码蛋白通过不同机制导入血流形式和前循环形式的线粒体。布氏锥虫核编码线粒体蛋白不同的导入条件可能有助于其适应不同的生命形式。