Thirion-Marissiaux Anne-Françoise, Nader-Grosbois Nathalie
Catholic University of Louvain, Faculty of Psychology, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(6):547-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
Patterns of development of ToM belief abilities in intellectually disabled (ID) children and typically developing (TD) children matched on their developmental age were investigated. The links between cognition, language, social understanding and ToM belief abilities were examined. EDEI-R [Perron-Borelli M. (1996). Echelles Différentielles d'Efficiences Intellectuelles. Forme Révisée (EDEI-R). Paris: Editions et Applications Psychologiques.] was used to match participants and to assess social understanding. ECOSSE [Lecocq P. (1996). L'E.CO.S.SE. Une épreuve de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique. Paris: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.] assessed the level of syntactic and semantic comprehension of French speaking, to ensure a good comprehension of the questions in false belief tasks. Five tasks assessed the ability in visual perspective taking and in understanding of false belief. A difference in the global ToM ability was found between both groups (difference hypothesis in ID participants). Specific abilities in different ToM tasks showed developmental patterns partially different and partially similar, between ID and TD groups. The interest to assess the understanding of belief by means of several tasks is confirmed. Positive links between cognition, language and ToM abilities were found in both groups, but the impact of cognition and language on abilities in each ToM task is different in both groups. Finally, the specific impact of social understanding and of chronological age on abilities in false belief in ID group is discussed.
研究了智力残疾(ID)儿童和发育年龄匹配的正常发育(TD)儿童心理理论信念能力的发展模式。考察了认知、语言、社会理解与心理理论信念能力之间的联系。使用EDEI-R[佩龙-博雷利M.(1996年)。智力效率差异量表。修订版(EDEI-R)。巴黎:心理应用出版社]来匹配参与者并评估社会理解。使用ECOSSE[勒库克P.(1996年)。E.CO.S.SE。一种句法-语义理解测试。巴黎:北方大学出版社]评估法语的句法和语义理解水平,以确保对错误信念任务中的问题有良好的理解。通过五项任务评估视觉观点采择和错误信念理解能力。发现两组在整体心理理论能力上存在差异(ID组参与者的差异假设)。ID组和TD组在不同心理理论任务中的特定能力表现出部分不同和部分相似的发展模式。通过多项任务评估信念理解的重要性得到了证实。两组在认知、语言和心理理论能力之间均发现了正向联系,但两组中认知和语言对各心理理论任务能力的影响有所不同。最后,讨论了社会理解和实际年龄对ID组错误信念能力的具体影响。