Shaked Michal, Gamliel Ifat, Yirmiya Nurit
Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.
Autism. 2006 Mar;10(2):173-87. doi: 10.1177/1362361306062023.
Deficits in theory of mind (ToM), evident in most individuals with autism, have been suggested as a core deficit of autism. ToM difficulties in young siblings of children with autism (SIBS-A) compared to siblings of typically developing children (SIBS-TD) would place the former within the broad phenotype. We examined ToM's possible associations with measures of language, cognition, and daily living skills. Participants comprised 24 SIBS-A and 24 matched SIBSTD aged 4.6 years. They completed the false belief and the strange stories tasks. We also collected measures of verbal and cognitive ability and daily living skills. Non-significant differences emerged between the groups on both ToM tasks. Differences did emerge in within-group associations between ToM ability and receptive language. The conclusion is that SIBS-A show resilience in ToM abilities. Possibly, these deficits are not genetically transferred to siblings, at least as measured in laboratory-based ToM tasks.
心理理论(ToM)缺陷在大多数自闭症个体中很明显,被认为是自闭症的核心缺陷。与发育正常儿童的兄弟姐妹(SIBS-TD)相比,自闭症儿童的年幼兄弟姐妹(SIBS-A)存在的ToM困难会使前者处于广泛的表型范围内。我们研究了ToM与语言、认知和日常生活技能测量指标之间可能存在的关联。参与者包括24名4.6岁的SIBS-A和24名匹配的SIBS-TD。他们完成了错误信念和奇怪故事任务。我们还收集了言语和认知能力以及日常生活技能的测量指标。两组在两项ToM任务上均未出现显著差异。ToM能力与接受性语言之间的组内关联确实存在差异。结论是,SIBS-A在ToM能力方面表现出恢复力。可能这些缺陷不会遗传给兄弟姐妹,至少在基于实验室的ToM任务测量中是这样。