Suppr超能文献

经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检术中疼痛的控制:比较两种方法的前瞻性研究。

Control of pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective study comparing two methods.

作者信息

Bhomi K K, Lim H H, Consigliere D T, Tiong H Y

机构信息

Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2007;79(4):332-5. doi: 10.1159/000109719.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of intramuscular injection of 75 mg diclofenac sodium and periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) with 1% lignocaine in controlling pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsies were prospectively enrolled in the study. First, 20 patients did not get any form of analgesia/anesthesia and served as control; next, 20 patients received an intramuscular injection of diclofenac sodium. PPNB with 1% lignocaine was performed in the remaining 80 patients. Pain was assessed using Wong-Baker Faces Pain-Rating Scale (0-10).

RESULTS

All three groups of patients were comparable at baseline in terms of age, prostate-specific antigen and final histological diagnosis. The mean pain scores (+/-SD) for control, diclofenac and PPNB groups were 5.10 +/- 3.14, 3.70 +/- 2.36 and 2.24 +/- 1.63, respectively. The difference was statistically significant between control and PPNB (p = 0.001), and diclofenac and PPNB (p = 0.002), but not between the control and diclofenac group (p = 0.120). In addition, the proportion of patients having mild or no pain (defined as pain score <or=3) during the biopsy was greater in the PPNB group (71%) compared with the diclofenac group (45%) and the control group (30%) (p = 0.001). The total duration for TRUS biopsy was not significantly different between the three groups (p = 0.114).

CONCLUSION

PPNB with 1% lignocaine significantly decreases pain associated with prostate biopsy when compared with control and intramuscular diclofenac.

摘要

目的

评估肌肉注射75毫克双氯芬酸钠及用1%利多卡因进行前列腺周围神经阻滞(PPNB)在经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下前列腺穿刺活检术中控制疼痛的效果。

材料与方法

共有120例行TRUS引导下前列腺穿刺活检的患者前瞻性纳入本研究。首先,20例患者未接受任何形式的镇痛/麻醉,作为对照组;接下来,20例患者接受肌肉注射双氯芬酸钠。其余80例患者用1%利多卡因进行PPNB。使用面部表情疼痛评分量表(0 - 10分)评估疼痛程度。

结果

三组患者在年龄、前列腺特异性抗原及最终组织学诊断方面基线可比。对照组、双氯芬酸钠组和PPNB组的平均疼痛评分(±标准差)分别为5.10±3.14、3.70±2.36和2.24±1.63。对照组与PPNB组(p = 0.001)、双氯芬酸钠组与PPNB组(p = 0.002)之间差异有统计学意义,但对照组与双氯芬酸钠组之间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.120)。此外,活检期间疼痛轻微或无疼痛(定义为疼痛评分≤3分)的患者比例,PPNB组(71%)高于双氯芬酸钠组(45%)和对照组(30%)(p = 0.001)。三组TRUS活检的总时长差异无统计学意义(p = 0.114)。

结论

与对照组及肌肉注射双氯芬酸钠相比,用1%利多卡因进行PPNB可显著减轻前列腺穿刺活检相关的疼痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验