Suppr超能文献

一种用于癌症生长建模的多层次方法。

A multilevel approach to cancer growth modeling.

作者信息

Delsanto P P, Condat C A, Pugno N, Gliozzi A S, Griffa M

机构信息

Department of Physics, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2008 Jan 7;250(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.023. Epub 2007 Sep 25.

Abstract

Cancer growth models may be divided into macroscopic models, which describe the tumor as a single entity, and microscopic ones, which consider the tumor as a complex system whose behavior emerges from the local dynamics of its basic components, the neoplastic cells. Mesoscopic models (e.g. as based on the Local Interaction Simulation Approach [Delsanto, P.P., Mignogna, R., Scalerandi, M., Schechter, R., 1998. In: Delsanto, P.P. Saenz, A.W. (Eds.), New Perspectives on Problems in Classical and Quantum Physics, vol. 2. Gordon & Breach, New Delhi, p. 5174]), which explicitly consider the behavior of cell clusters and their interactions, may be used instead of the microscopic ones, in order to study the properties of cancer biology that strongly depend on the interactions of small groups of cells at intermediate spatial and temporal scales. All these approaches have been developed independently, which limits their usefulness, since they all include relevant features and information that should be cross-correlated for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved. In this contribution we consider multicellular tumor spheroids as biological reference systems and propose an intermediate model to bridge the gap between a macroscopic formulation of tumor growth and a mesoscopic one. Thus we are able to establish, as an important result of our formalism, a direct correspondence between parameters characterizing processes occurring at different scales. In particular, we analyze their dependence on an important limiting factor to tumor growth, i.e. the extra-cellular matrix pressure. Since the macro and meso-models stem from totally different roots (energy conservation and clinical observations vs. cell groups dynamics), their consistency may be used to validate both approaches. It may also be interesting to note that the proposed formalism fits well into a recently proposed conjecture of growth laws universality.

摘要

癌症生长模型可分为宏观模型和微观模型,宏观模型将肿瘤描述为一个单一实体,微观模型则将肿瘤视为一个复杂系统,其行为源自其基本组成部分即肿瘤细胞的局部动态。介观模型(例如基于局部相互作用模拟方法[德尔桑托,P.P.,米尼奥尼亚,R.,斯卡莱兰迪,M.,谢克特,R.,1998年。载于:德尔桑托,P.P. 萨恩斯,A.W.(编),《经典与量子物理问题新视角》,第2卷。戈登与布雷克出版社,新德里,第5174页])明确考虑细胞簇的行为及其相互作用,可用于替代微观模型,以便研究在中等时空尺度上强烈依赖小细胞群相互作用的癌症生物学特性。所有这些方法都是独立开发的,这限制了它们的实用性,因为它们都包含了应该相互交叉关联以更深入理解所涉及机制的相关特征和信息。在本论文中,我们将多细胞肿瘤球体视为生物学参考系统,并提出一个中间模型来弥合肿瘤生长宏观表述与介观表述之间的差距。因此,作为我们形式体系的一个重要结果,我们能够在表征不同尺度上发生的过程的参数之间建立直接对应关系。特别是,我们分析了它们对肿瘤生长的一个重要限制因素即细胞外基质压力的依赖性。由于宏观模型和介观模型源于完全不同的根源(能量守恒和临床观察与细胞群动态),它们的一致性可用于验证这两种方法。还值得注意的是,所提出的形式体系很好地符合最近提出的生长规律普遍性猜想。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验