Uchida S, Iwasaki L R, Marx D B, Yotsui Y, Inoue H, Nickel J C
Department of Removeable Prosthodontics, Osaka Dental University, Temmabashi Campus, 5-17 Otemae 1-chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-0008, Japan.
Arch Oral Biol. 2008 Feb;53(2):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
Static mechanical analyses of the masticatory apparatus often assume that jaw muscle activity, as measured using electromyography (EMG), is linearly and constantly related to magnitude of bite force during biting, regardless of bite force-induced tooth-tipping moments. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the relationship between EMG of the jaw muscles and bite force varies with the magnitude and sign of tooth-tipping moments. Seven healthy male subjects produced unilateral static occlusal forces at five biting positions, resulting in sequential changes from buccal (+) to lingual (-) tipping moments on the mandibular first molar. Jaw muscle activities were recorded bilaterally using surface (for temporalis and masseter muscles) and indwelling (for lateral pterygoid muscles) electrodes. Bite forces were recorded and controlled using custom devices. EMG versus bite force data were plotted and regression relationships were calculated for each subject, muscle and biting position. Linear regression analysis, analysis of variance and Bonferroni adjusted least significant difference tests were used to determine the effects of muscle, side (ipsilateral, contralateral) and biting position within subjects. It was found that the relationship between EMG and bite force for different tipping moments differed significantly within a subject and muscle. This was most common in the lateral pterygoid and temporalis muscles (all P</=0.042), where slopes of the EMG:bite force relationship varied between 3:1 and >25:1. In the masseter muscle, the EMG:bite force relationship for different tipping moments differed significantly in one subject (P<0.008); slopes varied up to 4.6:1. In conclusion, the relationship between EMG and bite force was linear. However, the slopes of the relationship changed significantly depending on sign (+, -) and magnitude of tipping moments acting on the molars.
咀嚼器官的静态力学分析通常假定,使用肌电图(EMG)测量的颌肌活动在咬合过程中与咬合力大小呈线性且恒定的关系,而不考虑咬合力引起的牙倾斜力矩。本研究的目的是检验以下假设:颌肌肌电图与咬合力之间的关系会随着牙倾斜力矩的大小和方向而变化。七名健康男性受试者在五个咬合位置产生单侧静态咬合力,导致下颌第一磨牙的牙倾斜力矩从颊侧(+)到舌侧(-)依次变化。使用表面电极(用于颞肌和咬肌)和植入式电极(用于翼外肌)双侧记录颌肌活动。使用定制设备记录并控制咬合力。绘制肌电图与咬合力数据图,并计算每个受试者、肌肉和咬合位置的回归关系。使用线性回归分析、方差分析和Bonferroni校正的最小显著差异检验来确定受试者内肌肉、侧别(同侧、对侧)和咬合位置的影响。结果发现,在同一受试者和肌肉内,不同倾斜力矩下肌电图与咬合力之间的关系存在显著差异。这在翼外肌和颞肌中最为常见(所有P≤0.042),其中肌电图与咬合力关系的斜率在3:1至>25:1之间变化。在咬肌中,一名受试者不同倾斜力矩下的肌电图与咬合力关系存在显著差异(P<0.008);斜率变化高达4.6:1。总之,肌电图与咬合力之间的关系是线性的。然而,该关系的斜率会根据作用于磨牙的倾斜力矩的方向(+、-)和大小而显著变化。