Hagberg C
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1986;37:1-64.
Electromyographic (EMG) activity versus bite force was studied during a gradually increased isometric contraction up to maximal effort for patients with painful masseter muscles and referents. The masseter muscle, the anterior temporal muscle and the descending part of the trapezius muscle were chosen for the recordings. Bite force was registered with a bite force sensor placed between the first molars. The effects of double blind intramuscular injections of lidocaine and saline in the patients' masseter muscle were evaluated by EMG versus bite force and by assessment of discomfort. EMG activity during unilateral chewing was compared in terms of relative masticatory force between referents and patients by amplitude probability distribution analysis. Regression analyses showed intra-individually steeper slopes for high force levels than for low force levels for the masseter muscle. This was not observed for the anterior temporal muscle. These differences in slopes of the EMG versus force regressions for the masseter muscle and the anterior temporal muscle could be due to differences in recruitment pattern. The same intra-individual relationship between low and high force levels was found for referents and patients. An increased activity, especially among the patients, was found for the descending part of the trapezius muscle during stronger activity of the mandibular elevators. The EMG versus force relationship for low force levels of the masseter muscle was less steep after an intramuscular injection of lidocaine but not after saline. Both solutions for injection had a positive effect on the patients' assessments of discomfort one week after the injection. Three days after injection the patients who received lidocaine experienced a reduction in muscular discomfort. This reduction was not found among patients receiving saline. The amplitude probability distribution analysis revealed that the patients used greater relative masticatory forces than the referents during the chewing of an almond for all probability levels analysed below the peak load of the masseter muscles. Rough estimates of the peak masticatory forces in Newton (N) were for chewing an almond 364 N (referents); 373 N (patients) and for gum-chewing 239 N (referents); 238 N (patients) as regards the masseter muscle. The values were similar for the anterior temporal muscle.
对患有咬肌疼痛的患者及其对照者,在逐渐增加等长收缩直至最大用力的过程中,研究了肌电图(EMG)活动与咬力之间的关系。记录选取咬肌、颞前肌和斜方肌下行部。咬力通过置于第一磨牙之间的咬力传感器记录。通过EMG与咬力的关系以及不适评估,来评价利多卡因和生理盐水双盲肌内注射对患者咬肌的影响。通过幅度概率分布分析,比较了对照者和患者在单侧咀嚼时EMG活动的相对咀嚼力。回归分析表明,咬肌在高用力水平下的个体内斜率比低用力水平时更陡。颞前肌未观察到这种情况。咬肌和颞前肌的EMG与力回归斜率的这些差异可能是由于募集模式不同。对照者和患者在低用力水平和高用力水平之间发现了相同的个体内关系。在下颌升肌更强活动期间,斜方肌下行部的活动增加,尤其是在患者中。肌内注射利多卡因后,咬肌低用力水平下的EMG与力关系斜率变缓,但注射生理盐水后未变缓。两种注射溶液在注射一周后对患者的不适评估均有积极影响。注射三天后,接受利多卡因的患者肌肉不适减轻。接受生理盐水的患者未发现这种减轻。幅度概率分布分析表明,在分析的所有低于咬肌峰值负荷的概率水平下,患者在咀嚼杏仁时使用的相对咀嚼力比对照者更大。以牛顿(N)为单位的咀嚼杏仁时咬肌峰值咀嚼力的粗略估计值为:对照者364 N;患者373 N,咀嚼口香糖时为:对照者239 N;患者238 N。颞前肌的值相似。