Dautzenberg P L, Bezemer P D
Department of Geriatrics, Slotevaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neth J Med. 1991 Dec;39(5-6):366-72.
A written 'do not resuscitate' (DNR) order is given after judging cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as medically futile in either quantitative (effectiveness of CPR) or qualitative (quality of life before and after CPR) terms. Eighteen resuscitation studies have been reviewed, with special attention being paid to the definitions of CPR, the pre-arrest morbidity, the localization of the CPR in a hospital and the effectiveness of CPR. The effectiveness of CPR (as discharge rate from the hospital) of elderly in-patients is only below 5% in exceptional conditions. This suggests that there are no quantitative reasons for withholding CPR from an elderly patient simply because of age. The qualitative aspects of CPR seem to be more important, but more studies are needed to clarify the practice of present-day DNR policy. The qualitative aspects of CPR need ethical consideration, and two main viewpoints are discussed: favouring the physician's authority and favouring the patient's authority. Because of a lack of thorough research, practical advice remains difficult.
在判断心肺复苏(CPR)在定量(CPR的有效性)或定性(CPR前后的生活质量)方面在医学上无意义后,会下达书面的“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱。已对18项复苏研究进行了综述,特别关注了CPR的定义、心脏骤停前的发病率、CPR在医院中的实施地点以及CPR的有效性。老年住院患者CPR的有效性(作为出院率)仅在特殊情况下低于5%。这表明,仅仅因为年龄而不给老年患者进行CPR没有定量方面的理由。CPR的定性方面似乎更为重要,但需要更多研究来阐明当前DNR政策的实践。CPR的定性方面需要伦理考量,文中讨论了两种主要观点:支持医生的权威和支持患者的权威。由于缺乏深入研究,实际建议仍然很难给出。