Selvarajah J R, Smith C J, Hulme S, Georgiou R F, Vail A, Tyrrell P J
Department of Neurology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;79(1):38-43. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.129163. Epub 2007 Nov 22.
The ABCD2 score predicts stroke risk within a few days of transient ischaemic attack (TIA). It is not clear whether the predictive value of the ABCD2 score can be generalised to UK TIA services, where delayed presentation of TIA and minor stroke are common. We investigated prognosis, and the use of the ABCD2 score, in patients attending TIA services in the North West of England with a diagnosis of TIA or minor stroke.
711 patients with TIA or minor stroke were prospectively recruited from five centres (median duration from index event to recruitment 15 days). The primary outcome was the composite of incident TIA, stroke, acute coronary syndrome or cardiovascular death at the 3 month follow-up. Prognostic factors were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression.
The primary outcome occurred in 126 (18%) patients. Overall, there were 30 incident strokes. At least one incident TIA occurred in 100 patients (14%), but only four had a subsequent stroke. In multifactorial analyses, the ABCD2 score was unrelated to the risk of the primary outcome, but predicted the risk of incident stroke: score 4-5: hazard ratio (HR) 3.4 (95% CI 1.0 to 12); score 6-7: HR 4.8 (1.3 to 18). Of the components of the ABCD2 score, unilateral motor weakness predicted both the primary outcome (HR 1.8 (1.2 to 2.8)) and stroke risk (HR 4.2 (1.3 to 14)).
In patients attending typical NHS TIA services, the risk of incident stroke was relatively low, probably reflecting delays to assessment. Current provision of TIA services, where delayed presentation to "rapid access" TIA clinics is common, does not appear to provide an appropriate setting for urgent evaluation, risk stratification or timely secondary prevention for those who may be at highest risk.
ABCD2评分可预测短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)后数天内的中风风险。尚不清楚ABCD2评分的预测价值是否可推广至英国的TIA服务,在英国,TIA和轻度中风延迟就诊的情况很常见。我们对英格兰西北部就诊于TIA服务机构且诊断为TIA或轻度中风的患者的预后及ABCD2评分的应用进行了调查。
从五个中心前瞻性招募了711例TIA或轻度中风患者(从索引事件到招募的中位时间为15天)。主要结局是3个月随访时发生的TIA、中风、急性冠状动脉综合征或心血管死亡的复合情况。使用Cox比例风险回归分析预后因素。
126例(18%)患者出现主要结局。总体而言,有30例发生中风。100例患者(14%)至少发生一次TIA,但只有4例随后发生中风。在多因素分析中,ABCD2评分与主要结局风险无关,但可预测中风发生风险:评分4 - 5:风险比(HR)3.4(95%置信区间1.0至12);评分6 - 7:HR 4.8(1.3至18)。在ABCD2评分的各组成部分中,单侧运动无力可预测主要结局(HR 1.8(1.2至2.8))和中风风险(HR 4.2(1.3至14))。
在就诊于典型国民保健服务(NHS)TIA服务机构的患者中,中风发生风险相对较低,这可能反映了评估延迟的情况。目前的TIA服务中,延迟前往 “快速就诊” TIA诊所的情况很常见,对于那些可能处于最高风险的患者而言,这似乎并非进行紧急评估、风险分层或及时二级预防的合适环境。