Ilhan Fatih, Kurt Ugur, Apaydin Omer, Gonullu M Talha
Yildiz Technical University, Environmental Engineering Department, 34349 Istanbul, Turkey.
J Hazard Mater. 2008 Jun 15;154(1-3):381-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.035. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
In this paper, treatment of leachate by electrocoagulation (EC) has been investigated in a batch process. The sample of leachate was supplied from Odayeri Landfill Site in Istanbul. Firstly, EC was compared with classical chemical coagulation (CC) process via COD removal. The first comparison results with 348 A/m2 current density showed that EC process has higher treatment performance than CC process. Secondly, effects of process variables such as electrode material, current density (from 348 to 631 A/m2), pH, treatment cost, and operating time for EC process are investigated on COD and NH4-N removal efficiencies. The appropriate electrode type search for EC provided that aluminum supplies more COD removal (56%) than iron electrode (35%) at the end of the 30 min operating time. Finally, EC experiments were also continued to determine the efficiency of ammonia removal, and the effects of current density, mixing, and aeration. All the findings of the study revealed that treatment of leachate by EC can be used as a step of a joint treatment.
本文采用间歇式工艺研究了电凝聚(EC)法处理渗滤液。渗滤液样本取自伊斯坦布尔的奥代里垃圾填埋场。首先,通过化学需氧量(COD)去除率将电凝聚法与传统化学混凝(CC)法进行比较。在电流密度为348 A/m²时的首次比较结果表明,电凝聚法的处理性能高于化学混凝法。其次,研究了电极材料、电流密度(348至631 A/m²)、pH值、处理成本以及电凝聚法的运行时间等工艺变量对COD和NH₄-N去除效率的影响。对电凝聚法适用电极类型的研究表明,在30分钟运行时间结束时,铝电极对COD的去除率(56%)高于铁电极(35%)。最后,还继续进行了电凝聚实验以确定氨去除效率以及电流密度、混合和曝气的影响。该研究的所有结果表明,电凝聚法处理渗滤液可作为联合处理的一个步骤。