Kirmayer Laurence J, Sartorius Norman
Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste Catherine Rd., Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E4, Canada.
Psychosom Med. 2007 Dec;69(9):832-40. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815b002c.
To review the relevance of cultural models in the generation and amplification of somatic symptoms and syndromes.
Based on a selective review of literature, we examine evidence that cultural and personal explanatory models can contribute to the pathogenesis, symptomatology, and chronicity of medically unexplained symptoms and functional somatic syndromes.
In the contemporary world, culture involves flows of information, roles, and institutions that offer individuals multiple models for understanding illness. Cultural models include 1) explanatory models, which make causal attributions and impute specific mechanisms or processes of pathophysiology; 2) prototypes, which are salient images or exemplars drawn from personal experience, family, friends, mass media, and popular culture that are used to reason analogically about one's own condition; and 3) implicit models and procedural knowledge that may be difficult to articulate because they are embedded in body practices and ways of experiencing distress. Symptom attributions and explanations can participate in vicious circles of symptom amplification that give rise to culture-specific varieties of panic disorder, hypochondriacal worry, and medically unexplained symptoms.
Clinical research using the methods of experimental cognitive and social psychology as well as community-based ethnographic and ecological research are needed to advance our understanding of the impact of personal and cultural models on somatic distress. Nevertheless, the current state of knowledge on social and cultural dimensions of somatic syndromes suggests a typology of forms of psychosomatic and sociosomatic looping that has implications for the nosology of somatoform disorders.
回顾文化模型在躯体症状和综合征的产生及放大过程中的相关性。
基于对文献的选择性回顾,我们考察了文化和个人解释模型有助于医学上无法解释的症状及功能性躯体综合征的发病机制、症状表现和慢性化的证据。
在当代社会,文化涉及信息、角色和机构的流动,这些为个体提供了多种理解疾病的模型。文化模型包括:1)解释模型,其进行因果归因并赋予病理生理学的特定机制或过程;2)原型,即从个人经历、家庭、朋友、大众媒体和流行文化中提取的显著形象或范例,用于对自身状况进行类比推理;3)隐性模型和程序性知识,由于它们嵌入身体实践和体验痛苦的方式中,可能难以阐明。症状归因和解释可能会参与症状放大的恶性循环,从而产生特定文化类型的惊恐障碍、疑病性担忧和医学上无法解释的症状。
需要运用实验认知和社会心理学方法以及基于社区的人种学和生态学研究来推进我们对个人和文化模型对躯体痛苦影响的理解。然而,目前关于躯体综合征社会和文化维度的知识状态提示了一种心身和社会躯体循环形式的分类法,这对躯体形式障碍的疾病分类学具有启示意义。