• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策冲突中应对方式的认知动机相关性。

Cognitive motivation correlates of coping style in decisional conflict.

作者信息

Bouckenooghe Dave, Vanderheyden Karlien, Mestdagh Steven, Van Laethem Sarah

机构信息

Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

J Psychol. 2007 Nov;141(6):605-25. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.141.6.605-626.

DOI:10.3200/JRLP.141.6.605-626
PMID:18044274
Abstract

Can personality traits account for the handling of internal conflicts? The authors explored how individual differences in information-processing style affect coping patterns displayed before making important decisions. Need for cognition and need for cognitive closure were linked to the major tendencies identified in the conflict theory of decision making: vigilance, hypervigilance, and defensive avoidance (buck passing and procrastination). A sample of 1,119 Belgian human resource professionals completed the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire, the 18-item short-form Need for Cognition Scale, and the Need for Closure Inventory. Ordinary least squares regression analysis indicated that significant relationships existed between need for cognition, need for closure, and conflict decision-making styles. The authors also found significant effects of gender and age.

摘要

人格特质能解释内部冲突的处理方式吗?作者探讨了信息处理风格的个体差异如何影响在做出重要决策之前所表现出的应对模式。认知需求和认知闭合需求与决策冲突理论中确定的主要倾向相关联:警觉、过度警觉和防御性回避(推诿和拖延)。1119名比利时人力资源专业人员的样本完成了墨尔本决策问卷、18项简版认知需求量表和认知闭合需求量表。普通最小二乘法回归分析表明,认知需求、闭合需求与冲突决策风格之间存在显著关系。作者还发现了性别和年龄的显著影响。

相似文献

1
Cognitive motivation correlates of coping style in decisional conflict.决策冲突中应对方式的认知动机相关性。
J Psychol. 2007 Nov;141(6):605-25. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.141.6.605-626.
2
Emotional vulnerability and coping styles for resolving decisional conflict.情绪脆弱性与应对方式对决策冲突解决的影响。
J Psychol. 2011 Jul-Aug;145(4):297-312. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2011.565381.
3
Indecision and avoidant procrastination: the role of morningness-eveningness and time perspective in chronic delay lifestyles.优柔寡断与回避型拖延:晨型-夜型和时间观念在慢性拖延生活方式中的作用
J Gen Psychol. 2008 Jul;135(3):228-40. doi: 10.3200/GENP.135.3.228-240.
4
Decision making in depression: differences in decisional conflict between healthy and depressed individuals.抑郁症中的决策制定:健康个体与抑郁个体之间决策冲突的差异。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):285-98. doi: 10.1002/cpp.651.
5
Coping patterns in adolescent decision making: an Israeli-Australian comparison.
J Adolesc. 1993 Jun;16(2):187-99. doi: 10.1006/jado.1993.1016.
6
Chronic procrastination among Turkish adults: exploring decisional, avoidant, and arousal styles.土耳其成年人中的慢性拖延:探索决策、回避和唤醒风格。
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;149(3):402-8. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.3.402-408.
7
The cognitive nature of forgiveness: using cognitive strategies of primary appraisal and coping to describe the process of forgiving.宽恕的认知本质:运用初级评估和应对的认知策略来描述宽恕的过程。
J Clin Psychol. 2007 Jun;63(6):555-66. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20367.
8
AIDS-related health behavior: coping, protection motivation, and previous behavior.艾滋病相关健康行为:应对方式、保护动机及既往行为
J Behav Med. 1991 Oct;14(5):429-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00845103.
9
[Depression and response: impact of personality and cognition].
Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Apr;36(3):132-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090102. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
10
Italian version of the defense style questionnaire.防御方式问卷意大利语版本。
Compr Psychiatry. 2004 Nov-Dec;45(6):483-94. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.012.

引用本文的文献

1
The benefit of extrinsic motivation on effortful cognitive control is influenced by need for cognition.外在动机对努力的认知控制的益处受到认知需求的影响。
Psychol Res. 2025 Jan 18;89(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02074-0.
2
Diagnostic criteria to differentiate pathological procrastinators from common delayers: a re-analysis.区分病理性拖延者与普通拖延者的诊断标准:一项重新分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 6;14:1147401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1147401. eCollection 2023.
3
Personal Need for Structure and Fractions in Mathematical Education.
数学教育中个人对结构和分数的需求。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Apr 29;12(5):448-457. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12050033.
4
Self-Regulation of Slippery Deadlines: The Role of Procrastination in Work Performance.灵活截止日期的自我调节:拖延在工作绩效中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 6;12:783789. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783789. eCollection 2021.
5
Gender, Socioeconomic Status, Cultural Differences, Education, Family Size and Procrastination: A Sociodemographic Meta-Analysis.性别、社会经济地位、文化差异、教育程度、家庭规模与拖延:一项社会人口学荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:719425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719425. eCollection 2021.
6
Decision-Making and the Alternative Five Factor Personality Model: Exploring the Role of Personality Traits, Age, Sex and Social Position.决策与替代性五因素人格模型:探索人格特质、年龄、性别和社会地位的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:717705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717705. eCollection 2021.
7
Screening the Personal Need for the Structure and solving word problems with fractions.评估个人对结构的需求以及解决分数应用题。
Springerplus. 2016 May 17;5:652. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2285-3. eCollection 2016.
8
The closed-mindedness that wasn't: need for structure and expectancy-inconsistent information.并非封闭的思维:对结构和期望不一致信息的需求
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 2;6:896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00896. eCollection 2015.
9
Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.应对癌症相关威胁的监测方式:文献综述
J Behav Med. 2014 Oct;37(5):931-54. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9553-x. Epub 2014 Feb 2.