Margolis Robert H, Saly George L
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
Int J Audiol. 2007 Dec;46(12):746-58. doi: 10.1080/14992020701572652.
Hearing losses are frequently described by categories that characterize the configuration, severity, and site of lesion from a pure-tone audiogram. Although many category descriptors are in common use, there are no standard definitions of those terms, nor have the category definitions been validated against current clinical practice. The development and validation of AMCLASStrade mark is described. To validate the classification method, five expert judges selected configuration, severity, and site of lesion categories for 231 audiograms that varied widely in audiometric configuration. Interjudge comparisons indicated that expert judges frequently disagree on how they describe an audiogram. Category definitions were adjusted to maximize agreement between AMCLASStrade mark and the consensus of the judges. The final set of category definitions produced categories that agreed with the consensus more often than the average agreement between pairs of judges.
听力损失通常根据纯音听力图中病变的形态、严重程度和部位的类别来描述。尽管许多类别描述符被广泛使用,但这些术语并没有标准定义,而且这些类别定义也没有根据当前的临床实践进行验证。本文描述了AMCLASStrade mark的开发和验证过程。为了验证分类方法,五名专家评委为231份听力图选择了病变的形态、严重程度和部位类别,这些听力图在听力配置上差异很大。评委间的比较表明,专家评委在描述听力图的方式上经常存在分歧。对类别定义进行了调整,以最大限度地提高AMCLASStrade mark与评委共识之间的一致性。最终的类别定义集所产生的类别与共识的一致性,比评委两两之间的平均一致性更高。