• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脆性骨折患者的骨质疏松症疾病管理:基于三年骨质疏松症护理服务经验的新认识

Osteoporosis disease management for fragility fracture patients: new understandings based on three years' experience with an osteoporosis care service.

作者信息

Harrington J Timothy, Lease JoEllen

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53715, USA.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1502-6. doi: 10.1002/art.23093.

DOI:10.1002/art.23093
PMID:18050169
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the 3-year performance of an established osteoporosis care service and consider further improvements in an effort to reduce fragility fractures.

METHODS

Osteoporosis care has been coordinated for all willing and able patients with orthopedic fragility fractures in our health system by a nurse and medical director since 2003, using a guideline-based care algorithm and task management software. Patients were followed by telephone for 2 years to monitor their status and optimize adherence to treatment. Demographics, management recommendations, clinical data, and adherence to treatment were reviewed for the 2003-2005 patient population.

RESULTS

Of 1,019 patients with fragility fractures, 61% underwent osteoporosis evaluation and treatment. The remainder included 15% who refused to participate and 24% who were unable to participate for various logistical and health reasons. More patients age >80 years were unwilling or unable to participate. Bone densities (dual x-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) were normal, low, or osteoporotic in 24%, 55%, and 21% of patients, respectively, and 60% of the osteoporotic group had > or = 1 abnormal metabolic bone laboratory result. Only 17% of the total reported a previous fracture, and 47% had ever undergone DXA. Few experienced bone loss, a new fracture, or bisphosphonate intolerance during treatment.

CONCLUSION

An osteoporosis care service has coordinated care for every willing and able fragility fracture patient with positive outcomes. In addition, the results suggest a high priority for earlier proactive diagnosis and intervention of the at-risk population if fractures are to be reduced.

摘要

目的

回顾一项成熟的骨质疏松症护理服务的三年运行情况,并考虑进一步改进以减少脆性骨折。

方法

自2003年起,在我们的医疗系统中,由一名护士和医疗主任为所有愿意且能够接受治疗的骨科脆性骨折患者协调骨质疏松症护理,采用基于指南的护理算法和任务管理软件。通过电话随访患者2年,以监测其状况并优化治疗依从性。对2003 - 2005年患者群体的人口统计学、管理建议、临床数据和治疗依从性进行了回顾。

结果

在1019例脆性骨折患者中,61%接受了骨质疏松症评估和治疗。其余患者包括15%拒绝参与和24%因各种后勤和健康原因无法参与的患者。年龄>80岁的患者中,更多人不愿意或无法参与。患者的骨密度(双能X线吸收法[DXA])分别有24%正常、55%低骨量或21%骨质疏松,骨质疏松组中60%有≥1项代谢性骨实验室检查结果异常。总共只有17%的患者报告有既往骨折史,47%的患者曾接受过DXA检查。治疗期间很少有人出现骨质流失、新发骨折或双膦酸盐不耐受情况。

结论

一项骨质疏松症护理服务已为每一位愿意且能够接受治疗的脆性骨折患者协调了护理,取得了积极成果。此外,结果表明,如果要减少骨折,对高危人群进行早期主动诊断和干预具有高度优先性。

相似文献

1
Osteoporosis disease management for fragility fracture patients: new understandings based on three years' experience with an osteoporosis care service.脆性骨折患者的骨质疏松症疾病管理:基于三年骨质疏松症护理服务经验的新认识
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1502-6. doi: 10.1002/art.23093.
2
Redesigning the care of fragility fracture patients to improve osteoporosis management: a health care improvement project.重新设计脆性骨折患者的护理以改善骨质疏松症管理:一项医疗保健改进项目。
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Apr 15;53(2):198-204. doi: 10.1002/art.21072.
3
[Evaluation of a strategy for the management of accompanying osteoporosis after inpatient treatment of fragility fractures].[脆性骨折住院治疗后伴发骨质疏松症管理策略的评估]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Jan-Feb;146(1):52-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965683.
4
Osteoporosis and vertebral compression fractures-continued missed opportunities.骨质疏松症与椎体压缩骨折——持续错失的机会
Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):756-62. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
5
Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon.脆性骨折与骨质疏松症护理缺口:一种国际现象。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Apr;35(5):293-305. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2005.11.001.
6
[Progress in the treatment of osteoporosis].[骨质疏松症的治疗进展]
Rinsho Byori. 2008 Oct;56(10):887-93.
7
Interventions to improve inpatient osteoporosis management following first osteoporotic fracture: the PREVENT project.首次骨质疏松性骨折后改善住院骨质疏松管理的干预措施:预防项目。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Feb;129(2):245-50. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0809-1. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
8
Successes and failures in improving osteoporosis care after fragility fracture: results of a multiple-site clinical improvement project.脆性骨折后改善骨质疏松症护理的成功与失败:多中心临床改善项目的结果
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):724-8. doi: 10.1002/art.22234.
9
The osteoporosis care gap in Canada.加拿大骨质疏松症护理缺口
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 Apr 6;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-11.
10
Assessing compliance, acceptance, and tolerability of teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis who fractured while on antiresorptive treatment or were intolerant to previous antiresorptive treatment: an 18-month, multicenter, open-label, prospective study.评估特立帕肽在接受抗吸收治疗时发生骨折或对先前抗吸收治疗不耐受的骨质疏松症患者中的依从性、接受度和耐受性:一项为期18个月的多中心、开放标签、前瞻性研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):2055-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.024.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the FLS model on patients with major fracture in Gran Canaria: 2018-2022 experience.FLS模型对大加那利岛严重骨折患者的影响:2018 - 2022年经验
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 Mar 7;20(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01514-7.
2
Implementing an Electronic Medical Record Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool Score Which Identifies Patients at Risk for Osteoporosis Promotes Osteoporosis Evaluation.实施一种电子病历骨质疏松症自我评估工具评分,该评分可识别骨质疏松症高危患者,从而促进骨质疏松症评估。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Mar 25;12:21514593211002157. doi: 10.1177/21514593211002157. eCollection 2021.
3
What is the Role of Coordinators in the Secondary Fracture Prevention Program?
协调员在二次骨折预防项目中扮演什么角色?
J Bone Metab. 2020 Aug;27(3):187-199. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2020.27.3.187. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
4
Bone Health Improvement Protocol.骨骼健康改善方案。
Kans J Med. 2017 Aug 30;10(3):62-66. eCollection 2017 Aug.
5
The impact of a standardized order set for the management of non-hip fragility fractures in a Fracture Liaison Service.骨折联络服务中用于非髋部脆性骨折管理的标准化医嘱集的影响
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Dec;27(12):3439-3447. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3669-5. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
6
Agreement between physicians' and nurses' clinical decisions for the management of the fracture liaison service (4iFLS): the Lucky Bone™ program.骨折联络服务(4iFLS)管理中医生与护士临床决策的一致性:幸运骨™项目。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Apr;27(4):1569-1576. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3413-6. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
Patient perceptions of provider barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention.患者对骨折后二级预防中医疗服务提供者障碍的认知。
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Nov;25(11):2581-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2804-4. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
Bone mineral density testing after fragility fracture: Informative test results likely.脆性骨折后骨密度检测:检测结果可能具有信息性。
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Dec;59(12):e564-71.
9
Patients' response toward an automated orthopedic osteoporosis intervention program.患者对自动化骨科骨质疏松症干预项目的反应。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2013 Sep;4(3):89-98. doi: 10.1177/2151458513502039.
10
Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study.优化骨折预防:骨折联络服务,一项观察性研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Feb;25(2):701-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2481-8. Epub 2013 Sep 13.