Cohen N L, Tsemberis S
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York.
New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1991 Winter(52):3-16. doi: 10.1002/yd.23319915203.
The development of outreach approaches to engage and provide services to the homeless mentally ill must account for the heterogeneity of the population. The homeless mentally ill as a group are symbols of the failure of a comprehensive and integrated system of community-based care to develop in conjunction with the widespread proliferation of deinstitutionalization policies over the past several decades. Life in a community is far more complex and less easily controlled than life in an institution. People are free to reject the label of patient and refuse all mental health services. An engagement strategy must therefore be devised from the knowledge of specific aspects of a person's life in that community, so that outreach and networking efforts can be sensitive to the total context of the problems experienced by that patient. A multidisciplinary team approach is essential to the effort to engage and monitor those chronically mentally ill individuals who are at risk for psychiatric and/or medical decompensation. A variety of skills are needed, and team members must be flexible about their roles on the team. The clinician, while maintaining expert psychiatric, diagnostic, and treatment skills, must at the same time be able to adapt to people in their own environments, provide them with necessary social and medical services, and interface with other agencies working with these persons. The work is very labor intensive. It may involve two or more clinicians spending entire days with one patient. During a crisis state, these patients will require even more intensive attention from multiple team members to prevent decompensation and rehospitalization. In conclusion, there is no one intervention style in the work of psychiatric outreach. While the type of intervention offered follows from the mission of the outreach program, all outreach teams must be able to address the totality of needs of people who are fragile and at risk for psychiatric and medical decompensation. Case management services cannot be segregated easily from the task of crisis intervention in the work with the seriously mentally ill. The failure to establish an accessible network of community-based services for those chronically disaffiliated populations of mentally ill gives the outreach team the critical role of brokering any available services needed to support the individual in the community. The flexibility required of the outreach team derives both from the scarcity of community-based resources and the heterogeneity of the population of chronically ill adults who will most need these services.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
制定外展方法以接触无家可归的精神病患者并为其提供服务,必须考虑到这一人群的异质性。在过去几十年里,随着非机构化政策的广泛推行,无家可归的精神病患者群体成为了基于社区的综合护理体系未能同步发展的象征。社区生活远比机构生活复杂,也更难控制。人们可以自由拒绝患者的标签并拒绝所有心理健康服务。因此,必须根据对一个人在该社区生活的具体方面的了解来制定参与策略,以便外展和建立联系的工作能够对该患者所经历问题的整体背景保持敏感。多学科团队方法对于接触和监测那些有精神和/或医疗失代偿风险的慢性精神病患者至关重要。这需要多种技能,团队成员必须对自己在团队中的角色保持灵活态度。临床医生在保持专业的精神病学、诊断和治疗技能的同时,必须能够在患者自己的环境中适应他们,为他们提供必要的社会和医疗服务,并与其他为这些人服务的机构进行对接。这项工作劳动强度很大。可能需要两名或更多临床医生花一整天时间陪伴一名患者。在危机状态下,这些患者将需要多个团队成员给予更密集的关注,以防止失代偿和再次住院。总之,精神病外展工作没有单一的干预方式。虽然提供的干预类型取决于外展项目的使命,但所有外展团队都必须能够满足那些脆弱且有精神和医疗失代偿风险的人的全部需求。在与严重精神病患者的工作中,病例管理服务不能轻易与危机干预任务分开。未能为那些长期脱离社会的精神病患者建立一个可及的基于社区的服务网络,使得外展团队在为社区中的个人提供所需的任何可用服务方面发挥着关键作用。外展团队所需的灵活性既源于基于社区的资源稀缺,也源于最需要这些服务的慢性病成年人群体的异质性。(摘要截选至400字)
New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1991
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010-6
Community Ment Health J. 2005-12
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1984-9
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016-3
J Okla State Med Assoc. 1998-11
Community Ment Health J. 1986