Cleland Carol E
Philosophy Department, Center for Astrobiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0232, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2007 Dec;38(4):847-61. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.09.007. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
The assumption that all life on Earth today shares the same basic molecular architecture and biochemistry is part of the paradigm of modern biology. This paper argues that there is little theoretical or empirical support for this widely held assumption. Scientists know that life could have been at least modestly different at the molecular level and it is clear that alternative molecular building blocks for life were available on the early Earth. If the emergence of life is, like other natural phenomena, highly probable given the right chemical and physical conditions then it seems likely that the early Earth hosted multiple origins of life, some of which produced chemical variations on life as we know it. While these points are often conceded, it is nevertheless maintained that any primitive alternatives to familiar life would have been eliminated long ago, either amalgamated into a single form of life through lateral gene transfer (LGT) or alternatively out-competed by our putatively more evolutionarily robust form of life. Besides, the argument continues, if such life forms still existed, we surely would have encountered telling signs of them by now. These arguments do not hold up well under close scrutiny. They reflect a host of assumptions that are grounded in our experience with large multicellular organisms and, most importantly, do not apply to microbial forms of life, which cannot be easily studied without the aid of sophisticated technologies. Significantly, the most powerful molecular biology techniques available-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of rRNA genes augmented by metagenomic analysis-could not detect such microbes if they existed. Given the profound philosophical and scientific importance that such a discovery would represent, a dedicated search for 'shadow microbes' (heretofore unrecognized 'alien' forms of terran microbial life) seems in order. The best place to start such a search is with puzzling (anomalous) phenomena, such as desert varnish, that resist classification as 'biological' or 'nonbiological'.
当今地球上所有生命都具有相同的基本分子结构和生物化学这一假设,是现代生物学范式的一部分。本文认为,这一被广泛接受的假设几乎没有理论或实证支持。科学家们知道,生命在分子水平上至少可能存在适度差异,而且很明显,早期地球上存在生命的替代分子构建模块。如果生命的出现像其他自然现象一样,在合适的化学和物理条件下极有可能发生,那么早期地球似乎存在多个生命起源,其中一些产生了我们所知生命的化学变体。虽然这些观点常常得到认可,但人们仍然认为,任何与熟悉的生命不同的原始替代形式早就被淘汰了,要么通过横向基因转移(LGT)合并为单一的生命形式,要么被我们假定进化上更强大的生命形式竞争淘汰。此外,这种观点还认为,如果这些生命形式仍然存在,我们现在肯定已经遇到它们存在的明显迹象了。这些论点在仔细审视下站不住脚。它们反映了一系列基于我们对大型多细胞生物的经验的假设,最重要的是,这些假设不适用于微生物生命形式,没有先进技术的帮助,微生物生命形式很难研究。值得注意的是,如果存在这样的微生物,现有的最强大的分子生物学技术——通过宏基因组分析增强的rRNA基因聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增——也无法检测到它们。鉴于这样的发现将具有深远的哲学和科学重要性,专门寻找“影子微生物”(迄今未被识别的地球微生物生命的“外星”形式)似乎是合适的。开展这种搜索的最佳起点是那些令人困惑(异常)的现象,比如沙漠漆,它们难以被归类为“生物的”或“非生物的”。