Markman Jonathan R, Markman Maurie
Department of History and Interdisciplinary Centre for Bioethics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1139-1146. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70381-9.
The Nuremberg Code has served as a foundation for ethical clinical research since its publication 60 years ago. This landmark document, developed in response to the horrors of human experimentation done by Nazi physicians and investigators, focused crucial attention on the fundamental rights of research participants and on the responsibilities of investigators. Although the Nuremberg Code has provided an important framework for discussions on the requirements of ethical clinical research, and has resulted in the development of other initiatives-eg, the Declaration of Helsinki and the Belmont Report-designed to ensure the rights and safety of human beings taking part in medical research, knowledge of both past events and the current complexity of research suggests further improvements are necessary in the existing approaches to human clinical research.
自60年前发布以来,《纽伦堡法典》一直是伦理临床研究的基础。这份具有里程碑意义的文件是针对纳粹医生和研究人员进行的人体实验的恐怖行为而制定的,它将关键注意力集中在研究参与者的基本权利以及研究者的责任上。尽管《纽伦堡法典》为关于伦理临床研究要求的讨论提供了重要框架,并促成了其他旨在确保参与医学研究的人类的权利和安全的倡议(例如《赫尔辛基宣言》和《贝尔蒙报告》)的制定,但对过去事件的了解以及当前研究的复杂性表明,现有的人体临床研究方法仍需进一步改进。