Michils A, Baldassarre S, Van Muylem A
Chest Dept, CUB Erasme, 808 Route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Eur Respir J. 2008 Mar;31(3):539-46. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00020407. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
Controlled studies have shown that monitoring of the exhaled nitric oxide fraction (F(eNO)) improves asthma management. However, the studies seldom consider the full range of patients seen in clinical practise. In the present study, the ability of F(eNO) to reflect asthma control over time is investigated in a regular clinical setting, and meaningful F(eNO) cut-off points and changes are identified. Answers to the Asthma Control Questionnaire and F(eNO) were recorded at least once in 341 unselected asthma patients. The whole population and subgroups were considered, i.e. both inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-naïve and low or high-to-medium (</= or >500 mug beclomethasone dipropionate equivalents.day(-1)) ICS-dose groups. An F(eNO) decrease <40% or increase <30% precludes asthma control optimisation or deterioration, respectively (negative predictive value 79 and 82%, respectively). In the present study's low-dose group, a decrease >40% indicated asthma control optimisation (positive predictive value (PPV) 83%). In ICS-naïve patients, F(eNO) >35 ppb predicted asthma control improvement in response to ICS (PPV 68%). In most cases, forced expiratory volume in one second assessments were not useful. In conclusion, in a given patient, exhaled nitric oxide fraction was found to be significantly related to asthma control over time. The overall ability of exhaled nitric oxide fraction to reflect asthma control was reduced in patients using high doses of inhaled corticosteroids. Forced expiratory volume in one second had little additional value in assessing asthma control.
对照研究表明,监测呼出一氧化氮分数(F(eNO))可改善哮喘管理。然而,这些研究很少考虑临床实践中所见的全部患者范围。在本研究中,在常规临床环境中研究了F(eNO)随时间反映哮喘控制情况的能力,并确定了有意义的F(eNO)临界值和变化情况。在341例未经挑选的哮喘患者中,至少记录一次哮喘控制问卷答案和F(eNO)。考虑了整个人群和亚组,即未使用吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)的患者以及低剂量或高至中剂量(≤或>500 μg二丙酸倍氯米松等效剂量·天⁻¹)ICS剂量组。F(eNO)下降<40%或上升<30%分别排除哮喘控制优化或恶化(阴性预测值分别为79%和82%)。在本研究的低剂量组中,下降>40%表明哮喘控制得到优化(阳性预测值(PPV)83%)。在未使用ICS的患者中,F(eNO)>35 ppb预测对ICS治疗有哮喘控制改善(PPV 68%)。在大多数情况下,一秒用力呼气量评估并无用处。总之,在特定患者中,发现呼出一氧化氮分数与随时间的哮喘控制显著相关。在使用高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素的患者中,呼出一氧化氮分数反映哮喘控制的总体能力降低。一秒用力呼气量在评估哮喘控制方面几乎没有额外价值。