Suppr超能文献

专业牙科保健工作者(牙医、牙科技师、助手)有噪声性听力损失的风险吗?

[Are professional dental health care workers (dentists, dental technicians, assistants) in danger of noise induced hearing loss?].

作者信息

Brusis T, Hilger R, Niggeloh R, Huedepohl J, Thiesen K-W

机构信息

Institut für Begutachtung, Köln.

出版信息

Laryngorhinootologie. 2008 May;87(5):335-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995328. Epub 2007 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rotating instruments in dentistry are radiating an unpleasant high-frequency noise, which was supposed to produce hearing loss by its loudness. Therefore frequently notifications and recognizing procedures were initiated because of the suspicion of occupational noise-induced hearing loss (German listing for occupational diseases as given by decree: Number 2301). In recent years dentists, dental technicians and dental assistants repeatedly had to be tested because of a suspicion for noise-induced inner ear damage.

METHODS

Noise measurements were performed in 3 working places of dentists and 7 dental laboratories.

RESULTS

In regard to dentists and dental assistants it was found that the aspirator, not the rotating instruments, was the most intense source for noise in the office. The averaged daily noise level was measured between 70 and 77 db(A) and was therefore obviously below the inner ear damaging limit of 85 dB(A). For dental technicians the on-site related averaged daily noise level was about 68 dB(A) and the person related averaged daily noise level was about 76 dB(A). In some particular cases 80 dB(A) were exceeded, but relevant levels for an occupational noise trauma were not reached. It has to be taken into consideration that the rotating instruments got a considerable noise reduction in the last decade. Additionally it has to be taken into account for the calculation that the averaged running time of rotating instruments is 30 minutes per day in the office. Therefore, a notification or a recognizing procedure can regularly stand aside.

CONCLUSION

An endangering by noise as given by the German occupational disease decree (more than 85 db(A)) cannot usually be expected for the dentist, the dental assistant and the dental technician.

摘要

背景

牙科旋转器械会发出令人不悦的高频噪音,人们认为其音量会导致听力损失。因此,由于怀疑职业性噪声性听力损失(根据法令列出的德国职业病清单:编号2301),频繁启动了通知和识别程序。近年来,牙医、牙科技师和牙科助手因怀疑噪声性内耳损伤而多次接受检测。

方法

在3个牙医工作场所和7个牙科实验室进行了噪声测量。

结果

对于牙医和牙科助手而言,发现办公室内噪音最强的来源是抽吸器,而非旋转器械。平均每日噪音水平在70至77分贝(A)之间,因此明显低于85分贝(A)的内耳损伤限值。对于牙科技师,现场相关的平均每日噪音水平约为68分贝(A),个人相关的平均每日噪音水平约为76分贝(A)。在某些特定情况下,超过了80分贝(A),但未达到职业性噪声性外伤的相关水平。必须考虑到,在过去十年中旋转器械的噪音有了显著降低。此外,在计算时必须考虑到,旋转器械在办公室的平均运行时间为每天30分钟。因此,通常无需进行通知或识别程序。

结论

对于牙医、牙科助手和牙科技师,通常不能预期会受到德国职业病法令规定的噪音危害(超过85分贝(A))。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验