• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Potential shift from coronary bypass surgery to percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease and its economic impact in the drug-eluting stent era.在药物洗脱支架时代,多支血管病变患者从冠状动脉搭桥手术向经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的潜在转变及其经济影响。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Dec;23(14):1139-45. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70885-1.
2
Cost of single-vessel and multivessel coronary drug-eluting stenting: comparison to the DRG funding level.单支血管和多支血管冠状动脉药物洗脱支架置入术的成本:与诊断相关分组(DRG)资金水平的比较。
Ital Heart J. 2005 Jan;6(1):52-8.
3
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease compared to coronary artery bypass surgery five-years after intervention.与冠状动脉搭桥手术相比,药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病患者术后五年的成本效益。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec 1;84(7):1029-39. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25397. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
4
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
5
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干或多支冠状动脉疾病:一项个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2481-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008.
6
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the FREEDOM trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗糖尿病合并多支血管病变患者的成本效益比较:来自 FREEDOM 试验的结果。
Circulation. 2013 Feb 19;127(7):820-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.147488. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
7
Comparison of multiple drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention and surgical revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: one-year clinical results and total treatment costs.多支冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与外科血运重建使用多种药物洗脱支架的比较:一年临床结果及总治疗费用
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 Nov;19(11):469-75.
8
[Can PCI with drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparative economic analysis regarding both therapeutic options based on clinical 12-month data reflecting the German social health care insurance system].药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能否取代冠状动脉搭桥手术?基于反映德国社会医疗保险系统的12个月临床数据对两种治疗方案进行的比较经济分析
Herz. 2005 Jun;30(4):332-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2694-5.
9
Economic outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease: one-year results from the SYNTAX trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗左主干或三血管病变患者的经济学结局:SYNTAX 试验一年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 1;79(2):198-209. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23147. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
10
The Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Stenting in High-Risk Patients: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Single-Centre Experience.高风险患者中冠状动脉旁路移植术与支架置入术的真实世界成本-效果分析:单中心经验的倾向评分匹配分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Oct;16(5):661-674. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0407-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Symptoms and feelings valued by patients after a percutaneous coronary intervention: a discrete-choice experiment to inform development of a new patient-reported outcome.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者重视的症状和感受:一项离散选择实验,为新的患者报告结局的开发提供信息。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e023141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023141.
2
Stratification of coronary artery disease patients for revascularization procedure based on estimating adverse effects.基于评估不良影响对冠状动脉疾病患者进行血运重建手术分层。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Feb 14;15:9. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0131-0.
3
Thirty-day in-hospital revascularization and mortality rates after acute myocardial infarction in seven Canadian provinces.加拿大七个省份急性心肌梗死后 30 天住院血运重建和死亡率。
Can J Cardiol. 2010 Aug-Sep;26(7):e243-8. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70415-3.
4
[Health-economic modeling on the use of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in coronary heart disease].[冠心病中药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉搭桥手术使用的健康经济模型]
Herz. 2009 May;34(3):231-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-009-3182-0. Epub 2009 May 16.
5
Molecular neurophysiology of taste in Drosophila.果蝇味觉的分子神经生理学
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004 Jan;61(1):10-8. doi: 10.1007/s00018-003-3182-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study Part II - Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel de novo coronary artery lesions.动脉血运重建治疗研究第二部分——西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗多支新发冠状动脉病变患者
EuroIntervention. 2005 Aug;1(2):147-56.
2
Revascularization strategies of coronary multiple vessel disease in the Drug Eluting Stent Era: one year follow-up results of the ERACI III Trial.药物洗脱支架时代冠状动脉多支血管病变的血运重建策略:ERACI III试验的一年随访结果
EuroIntervention. 2006 May;2(1):53-60.
3
Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents.西罗莫司和紫杉醇洗脱冠状动脉支架的安全性与有效性
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):998-1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067193. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
4
Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden.瑞典药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的长期疗效对比
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1009-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067722. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
5
Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents.停用氯吡格雷后的晚期临床事件可能会限制药物洗脱支架的益处:一项药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的观察性研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2584-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.026. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
6
Late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.药物洗脱支架的晚期血栓形成:随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Am J Med. 2006 Dec;119(12):1056-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.01.023.
7
Periprocedural and late consequences of overlapping Cypher sirolimus-eluting stents: pooled analysis of five clinical trials.西罗莫司洗脱支架重叠置入的围手术期及远期后果:五项临床试验的汇总分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jul 4;48(1):21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.058. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
8
Cost effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting stent in high-risk patients in Canada: an analysis from the C-SIRIUS trial.西罗莫司洗脱支架在加拿大高危患者中的成本效益:来自C-SIRIUS试验的分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2006;6(3):159-68. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200606030-00003.
9
Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy after drug-eluting stent placement: results from the PREMIER registry.药物洗脱支架置入术后噻吩并吡啶类药物治疗过早停药的患病率、预测因素及结果:PREMIER注册研究结果
Circulation. 2006 Jun 20;113(24):2803-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618066. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
10
Impact of completeness of percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization on long-term outcomes in the stent era.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗血管重建完整性对支架时代长期预后的影响。
Circulation. 2006 May 23;113(20):2406-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.612267. Epub 2006 May 15.

在药物洗脱支架时代,多支血管病变患者从冠状动脉搭桥手术向经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的潜在转变及其经济影响。

Potential shift from coronary bypass surgery to percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease and its economic impact in the drug-eluting stent era.

作者信息

Poulin Frédéric, Rinfret Stéphane, Gobeil François

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2007 Dec;23(14):1139-45. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70885-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70885-1
PMID:18060100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2652005/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents (DES) may promote percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures in patients traditionally referred for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and may save money.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to quantify the potential shift from CABG surgery to multivessel PCI in the DES era and to model the economic consequences.

METHODS

Based on predefined criteria, the feasibility of PCI was evaluated in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent CABG surgery before the availability of DES at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal's Notre-Dame Hospital (Montreal, Quebec). Modelling was used to evaluate the potential cost savings using multivessel PCI instead of CABG surgery. Equal one-year outcomes in both groups were assumed, with the exception of a 10% repeat revascularization (RR) rate in the DES group and a 4% RR rate in the CABG group. The impact of those assumptions was evaluated using 1000 Monte Carlo simulations.

RESULTS

The authors retrospectively evaluated that, of 289 patients who underwent CABG without concomitant valve surgery between January and December 2003, only 22 patients (8%) were good candidates for multivessel DES implantation. The procedures would have involved an average of 3.6 DES per patient. The average cost per revascularization procedure was $14,402 with surgery and $11,220 for multivessel DES implantation (using $2,200 DES), leading to a savings of $3,182 per patient. However, after including RR procedures, PCI would only have been associated with savings of $812 per surgery avoided. Monte Carlo analysis revealed that surgery may be less expensive than PCI in 36% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who underwent CABG surgery in 2003 were retrospectively judged to be ineligible for multivessel PCI with DES. In the rare eligible patient, multivessel PCI with DES is not expected to produce savings to health care costs in Canada unless the DES purchase cost continues to decrease.

摘要

背景

药物洗脱支架(DES)可能会推动经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在传统上适合冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者中应用,并且可能节省费用。

目的

本研究的目的是量化DES时代从CABG手术向多支血管PCI潜在的转变,并对其经济后果进行建模。

方法

基于预先设定的标准,在蒙特利尔大学圣母医院(魁北克省蒙特利尔)DES出现之前接受CABG手术的多支血管冠状动脉疾病患者中评估PCI的可行性。使用建模来评估使用多支血管PCI而非CABG手术可能节省的费用。假设两组的一年结局相同,但DES组的再次血运重建率(RR)为10%,CABG组为4%。使用1000次蒙特卡洛模拟评估这些假设的影响。

结果

作者回顾性评估发现,在2003年1月至12月期间接受CABG且未同时进行瓣膜手术的289例患者中,只有22例(8%)是多支血管DES植入的合适人选。这些手术平均每位患者需要3.6个DES。手术每次血运重建的平均费用为14,402美元,多支血管DES植入为11,并植入(使用2,200美元的DES),每位患者节省3,182美元。然而,纳入RR手术后,避免每次手术PCI仅节省812美元。蒙特卡洛分析显示,36%的患者手术费用可能低于PCI。

结论

回顾性判断,2003年接受CABG手术的大多数患者不符合多支血管DES PCI的条件。在极少数符合条件的患者中,除非DES购买成本持续下降,否则多支血管DES PCI预计不会为加拿大的医疗保健成本带来节省。