Suppr超能文献

主观肩关节评分与Constant评分的比较。

Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score.

作者信息

Gilbart Michael K, Gerber Christian

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):717-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.123.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and to compare it with the Constant score (CS). The SSV is defined as a patient's subjective shoulder assessment expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal shoulder, which would score 100%. Patients who underwent operative treatment for rotator cuff repair (n = 247), arthroplasty (n = 83), or stabilization for recurrent anterior instability (n = 111) were included in this study. Correlation between the SSV and CS was highest postoperatively and was higher in the rotator cuff group (0.80) than in the osteoarthritis (0.69) and instability (0.61) groups. The relative CS could reliably predict the variance in the SSV in patients with rotator cuff tears (54%) and osteoarthritis (41%) and, to a lesser extent, in instability patients (23%). The SSV is an easily administered, responsive, and valid measure of shoulder function. The SSV may offer an improvement over the CS in assessing shoulder instability patients, as the CS may overestimate the results of these patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估主观肩关节评分(SSV)并将其与Constant评分(CS)进行比较。SSV定义为患者对肩关节的主观评估,以完全正常的肩关节(评分为100%)的百分比来表示。本研究纳入了接受肩袖修复手术(n = 247)、关节成形术(n = 83)或复发性前脱位稳定手术(n = 111)的患者。SSV与CS之间的相关性在术后最高,且在肩袖组(0.80)高于骨关节炎组(0.69)和脱位组(0.61)。相对CS能够可靠地预测肩袖撕裂患者(54%)和骨关节炎患者(41%)的SSV变化,在脱位患者中预测程度较小(23%)。SSV是一种易于实施、有反应性且有效的肩关节功能测量方法。在评估肩关节脱位患者时,SSV可能比CS有所改进,因为CS可能高估了这些患者的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验