Fischer Rico, Miller Jeff, Shubert Torsten
Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1685-99. doi: 10.3758/bf03193502.
In this dual-task study, we applied both cross-talk logic and locus-of-slack logic to test whether participants can retrieve semantic categories in Task 2 in parallel to Task 1 bottleneck processing. Whereas cross-talk logic can detect parallel memory retrieval only in conditions of categorical overlap between tasks, the locus-of-slack approach is independent of such restrictions. As was expected, using the cross-talk logic, we found clear evidence for parallel retrieval of semantic categories when there was categorical overlap between tasks (Experiment 1). Locus-of-slack-based evidence for parallel semantic retrieval was found, however, both in conditions with (Experiment 1) and in those without (Experiment 2) categorical overlap between tasks. Crucially,however, increasing the demand for resources required to switch from Task 1 to Task 2 eliminated even the locus-of-slack-based evidence for parallel memory retrieval during the psychological refractory period (Experiment 3). Together, our results suggest that parallel retrieval is not bound to conditions of categorical overlap between tasks but, instead, is contingent upon resources needed for switching between tasks (e.g., Oriet, Tombu, & Jolicoeur, 2005).
在这项双任务研究中,我们应用了串扰逻辑和松弛位置逻辑,以测试参与者在任务2中是否能够与任务1的瓶颈处理并行检索语义类别。串扰逻辑只能在任务之间存在类别重叠的条件下检测并行记忆检索,而松弛位置方法则不受此类限制。正如预期的那样,使用串扰逻辑,我们发现在任务之间存在类别重叠时(实验1),有明确的证据表明语义类别可以并行检索。然而,无论是在任务之间存在类别重叠的条件下(实验1)还是不存在类别重叠的条件下(实验2),都发现了基于松弛位置的并行语义检索证据。然而,至关重要的是,增加从任务1切换到任务2所需的资源需求,甚至消除了心理不应期内基于松弛位置的并行记忆检索证据(实验3)。总之,我们的结果表明,并行检索并不局限于任务之间的类别重叠条件,而是取决于任务之间切换所需的资源(例如,奥里埃、通布和若利厄尔,2005年)。