Mammen Joshua M V, Fischer David R, Anderson Andrea, James Laura E, Nussbaum Michael S, Bower Robert H, Pritts Timothy A
Division of Education, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 4208, USA.
J Surg Educ. 2007 Nov-Dec;64(6):386-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.08.005.
Understanding the learning styles of individuals may assist in the tailoring of an educational program to optimize learning. General surgery faculty and residents have been characterized previously as having a tendency toward particular learning styles. We seek to understand better the learning styles of general surgery residents and differences that may exist within the population.
The Kolb Learning Style Inventory was administered yearly to general surgery residents at the University of Cincinnati from 1994 to 2006. This tool allows characterization of learning styles into 4 groups: converging, accommodating, assimilating, and diverging. The converging learning style involves education by actively solving problems. The accommodating learning style uses emotion and interpersonal relationships. The assimilating learning style learns by abstract logic. The diverging learning style learns best by observation. Chi-square analysis and analysis of variance were performed to determine significance.
Surveys from 1994 to 2006 (91 residents, 325 responses) were analyzed. The prevalent learning style was converging (185, 57%), followed by assimilating (58, 18%), accommodating (44, 14%), and diverging (38, 12%). At the PGY 1 and 2 levels, male and female residents differed in learning style, with the accommodating learning style being relatively more frequent in women and assimilating learning style more frequent in men (Table 1, p < or = 0.001, chi-square test). Interestingly, learning style did not seem to change with advancing PGY level within the program, which suggests that individual learning styles may be constant throughout residency training. If a resident's learning style changed, it tended to be to converging. In addition, no relation exists between learning style and participation in dedicated basic science training or performance on the ABSIT/SBSE.
Our data suggests that learning style differs between male and female general surgery residents but not with PGY level or ABSIT/SBSE performance. A greater understanding of individual learning styles may allow more refinement and tailoring of surgical programs.
了解个体的学习风格可能有助于定制教育计划以优化学习效果。普通外科教员和住院医师先前已被描述为具有特定学习风格的倾向。我们试图更好地了解普通外科住院医师的学习风格以及该群体中可能存在的差异。
1994年至2006年期间,每年对辛辛那提大学的普通外科住院医师进行科尔布学习风格量表测试。该工具可将学习风格分为4组:聚合型、顺应型、同化型和发散型。聚合型学习风格通过积极解决问题进行学习。顺应型学习风格利用情感和人际关系。同化型学习风格通过抽象逻辑进行学习。发散型学习风格通过观察学习效果最佳。进行卡方分析和方差分析以确定显著性。
对1994年至2006年的调查(91名住院医师,325份回复)进行了分析。最普遍的学习风格是聚合型(185人,57%),其次是同化型(58人,18%)、顺应型(44人,14%)和发散型(38人,12%)。在PGY 1和2级别,男性和女性住院医师的学习风格存在差异,顺应型学习风格在女性中相对更常见,同化型学习风格在男性中更常见(表1,p≤0.001,卡方检验)。有趣的是,在该项目中,学习风格似乎不会随着PGY级别的提高而改变,这表明个体学习风格在整个住院医师培训期间可能是恒定的。如果住院医师的学习风格发生变化,往往会转变为聚合型。此外,学习风格与参与专门的基础科学培训或ABSIT/SBSE成绩之间没有关系。
我们的数据表明,普通外科住院医师中男性和女性的学习风格存在差异,但与PGY级别或ABSIT/SBSE成绩无关。对个体学习风格有更深入的了解可能会使外科项目更加精细化和个性化。