Goldhahn J, Suhm N, Goldhahn S, Blauth M, Hanson B
Musculoskeletal Research, Schulthess Klinik Zürich, Lengghalde 2, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Jun;19(6):761-72. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0515-9.
The goal of our systematic literature search was to prove whether the experimentally shown influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation could be confirmed in clinical studies. Despite significant effects in several studies, this is not supported by pooled data due to lack of accurate osteoporosis assessment and complication definitions.
The fact that osteoporosis causes fractures is well-known; the assumption that it aggravates their orthopaedic treatment has not been proven. The goal of our systematic literature search was to find out whether the experimentally proven influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation could be confirmed in clinical studies.
A systematic electronic database search was performed identifying articles that evaluated complications after fracture fixation among patients suspected of having osteoporosis as measured by BMD or surrogates including Singh index or risk factors. To determine complications risks (relative risk within 95% confidence interval) data were pooled across studies, weighted by sample size and stratified by treatment type.
Ten studies out of 77 randomized controlled trials (51 hip, 23 distal radius and three proximal humerus studies) and three systematic reviews finally met eligibility criteria. Despite significant differences of the relative complication risk between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients in several studies, this could not be proven in the pooled data.
In contrast to biomechanical evidence that local osteoporosis affects anchorage of implants, this could not be reproduced in clinical studies, due to the lack of accurate osteoporosis assessment, missing complication definitions and heterogeneous inclusion criteria in these studies. Prospective studies are required that address specifically the correlation between local bone status and the risk of fixation failure.
我们系统文献检索的目的是证实骨质疏松症对骨折固定的实验性影响是否能在临床研究中得到证实。尽管在多项研究中有显著影响,但由于缺乏准确的骨质疏松症评估和并发症定义,汇总数据并不支持这一点。
骨质疏松症会导致骨折这一事实众所周知;但骨质疏松症会加重骨科治疗难度这一假设尚未得到证实。我们系统文献检索的目的是查明骨质疏松症对骨折固定的实验性证实影响是否能在临床研究中得到证实。
进行了系统的电子数据库检索,以识别那些评估疑似患有骨质疏松症患者(通过骨密度或替代指标如辛格指数或风险因素衡量)骨折固定后并发症的文章。为确定并发症风险(95%置信区间内的相对风险),对各研究的数据进行汇总,按样本量加权并按治疗类型分层。
77项随机对照试验(51项髋部、23项桡骨远端和3项肱骨近端研究)中的10项研究以及3篇系统评价最终符合纳入标准。尽管在多项研究中骨质疏松症患者与非骨质疏松症患者的相对并发症风险存在显著差异,但汇总数据无法证实这一点。
与局部骨质疏松症影响植入物锚固的生物力学证据相反,由于这些研究中缺乏准确的骨质疏松症评估、缺少并发症定义以及纳入标准不统一,这一点在临床研究中无法重现。需要开展前瞻性研究,专门探讨局部骨状态与固定失败风险之间的相关性。