• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[绵羊瘤胃黏膜对氨基酸的体外转运]

[In vitro transport of amino acids across the rumen mucosa in sheep].

作者信息

Fejes J, Faixová Z, Várady J, Cibula M

机构信息

Ustav fyziológie hospodárskych zvierat SAV, Kosice.

出版信息

Vet Med (Praha). 1991 Sep;36(9):551-9.

PMID:1807040
Abstract

Transfer of six amino acids through rumen epithelium of sheep has been studied on mucous and serous sides. Amino acids were classified into two groups: 1. lysine-arginine-glutamic acid, 2. glycine-alanine-leucine. The transfer of amino acids in triads was measured after 60 min. incubation. To determine amino acids transfer through rumen epithelium, three concentrations of amino acids were used: 1500: 150 and 15 mumol per 50 ml. In the first group of amino acids, the highest transfer of arginine was found in comparison with lysine and glutamic acid in all concentrations. The lowest transfer was found in glutamic acid. It follows from this that initial concentration of amino acids in the first group had no effect on amino acids transfer as far as the transfer of amino acids was as follows in all concentrations: arginine greater than lysine greater than glutamic acid. On the other hand, the composition of amino acids and initial concentration of amino acids in the second group exhibited the marked dependence on the transport of amino acids. The transfer of amino acids at the concentration of 1500 mumol per 50 ml was as follows: the passage of amino acids was the highest while this was lowest in alanine and leucine, at the concentration 150 mumol per 50 ml the highest transfer was found in alanine, it was lower in glycine and lowest in leucine and at the concentration 15 mumol per 50 ml the transfer of glycine was highest, lower in leucine and lowest in alanine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

已在绵羊瘤胃上皮的黏液侧和浆膜侧研究了六种氨基酸的转运情况。氨基酸被分为两组:1. 赖氨酸 - 精氨酸 - 谷氨酸;2. 甘氨酸 - 丙氨酸 - 亮氨酸。在孵育60分钟后测定三联体中氨基酸的转运情况。为了确定氨基酸通过瘤胃上皮的转运,使用了三种氨基酸浓度:每50毫升1500、150和15微摩尔。在第一组氨基酸中,在所有浓度下,与赖氨酸和谷氨酸相比,精氨酸的转运量最高。谷氨酸的转运量最低。由此可知,第一组氨基酸的初始浓度对氨基酸转运没有影响,因为在所有浓度下氨基酸的转运情况均为:精氨酸>赖氨酸>谷氨酸。另一方面,第二组氨基酸的组成和初始浓度对氨基酸的转运表现出明显的依赖性。每50毫升1500微摩尔浓度下氨基酸的转运情况如下:氨基酸的通过量最高,而丙氨酸和亮氨酸的通过量最低;每50毫升150微摩尔浓度下,丙氨酸的转运量最高,甘氨酸的转运量较低,亮氨酸的转运量最低;每50毫升15微摩尔浓度下,甘氨酸的转运量最高,亮氨酸的转运量较低,丙氨酸的转运量最低。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
[In vitro transport of amino acids across the rumen mucosa in sheep].[绵羊瘤胃黏膜对氨基酸的体外转运]
Vet Med (Praha). 1991 Sep;36(9):551-9.
2
[Transfer of amino acids across the rumen epithelium in sheep: interaction between leucine and lysine].[绵羊瘤胃上皮氨基酸转运:亮氨酸与赖氨酸之间的相互作用]
Vet Med (Praha). 1994;39(5):255-62.
3
[Passage of amino acids through the minimal wall in sheep].
Vet Med (Praha). 1977 Sep;22(9):523-8.
4
[Amino acid production in the isolated and perfused rumen wall of sheep].
Vet Med (Praha). 1980 Nov;25(11):675-82.
5
Absorption of leucine, alanine and lysine from the rumen.瘤胃对亮氨酸、丙氨酸和赖氨酸的吸收
Acta Vet Hung. 2001;49(1):81-6. doi: 10.1556/004.49.2001.1.10.
6
[Changes in the amino acid levels in hydrolysates of bacteria adhering to the rumen in sheep during feeding with high and low nitrogen diets].
Vet Med (Praha). 1992 May-Jun;37(5-6):293-305.
7
[Absorption of amino acids from the perfused ovine rumen].
Vet Med (Praha). 1978 Jun;23(6):337-45.
8
[Uptake of amino acids in the rumen epithelium in sheep].[绵羊瘤胃上皮中氨基酸的摄取]
Vet Med (Praha). 1997 Mar;42(3):61-5.
9
Degradation and outflow of amino acids from the rumen of sheep.绵羊瘤胃中氨基酸的降解与外流
Br J Nutr. 1989 Mar;61(2):397-408. doi: 10.1079/bjn19890126.
10
Influence of peptides and amino acids on fermentation rate and de novo synthesis of amino acids by mixed micro-organisms from the sheep rumen.肽和氨基酸对绵羊瘤胃混合微生物发酵速率及氨基酸从头合成的影响。
Br J Nutr. 1999 Apr;81(4):307-14.