Suppr超能文献

[胸大肌断裂——手术及非手术治疗后的临床结果]

[Ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle - clinical results after operative and non-operative treatment].

作者信息

Schmidt A, Johann K

机构信息

Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Klinik Saarlouis.

出版信息

Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2007 Dec;21(4):185-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963718.

Abstract

AIM

Ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle should be treated operatively due to the expected loss of strength following conservative treatment. Minimal-invasive surgery technique using suture anchors can lead to perfect anatomical refixation of the muscle. We report mid-term clinical results.

METHODS

We present clinical results of a comparative study concerning ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle. Between 2001 and 2006 a total number of 9 patients were treated operatively using suture anchors. The surgical procedure is described. A control group (n = 4) consisted of patients being treated conservatively in 1999 und 2000. For evaluation of results Bak's score was used.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up-time was six months. We found 4 very good and 4 good results, only one patient showed a satisfying result. Among the patients who had followed the conservative treatment regime only one had a good outcome while three patients remained in a satisfying condition. All type-1-ruptures according to Roller showed postoperatively nearly equal strength conditions for both sides.

CONCLUSION

The operative treatment of acute ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle in active people and athletes leads to better results concerning restoration of strength than conservative or delayed treatment. The surgical technique depends upon the type of rupture which has to be determined intraoperatively. The use of suture anchors aiming for intraosseous fixation helps to avoid intraoperative complications and leads to stable conditions with nearly full restoration of strength.

摘要

目的

由于保守治疗后预计会出现力量丧失,胸大肌断裂应采用手术治疗。使用缝合锚钉的微创手术技术可实现肌肉完美的解剖复位固定。我们报告中期临床结果。

方法

我们展示了一项关于胸大肌断裂的对比研究的临床结果。2001年至2006年期间,共有9例患者采用缝合锚钉进行手术治疗。描述了手术过程。一个对照组(n = 4)由1999年和2000年接受保守治疗的患者组成。使用巴克评分来评估结果。

结果

平均随访时间为6个月。我们发现4例结果非常好,4例结果良好,只有1例患者结果令人满意。在接受保守治疗方案的患者中,只有1例预后良好,而3例患者情况令人满意。根据罗勒分类,所有1型断裂术后两侧力量状况几乎相等。

结论

对于活跃人群和运动员的胸大肌急性断裂,手术治疗在力量恢复方面比保守治疗或延迟治疗效果更好。手术技术取决于术中确定的断裂类型。采用旨在进行骨内固定的缝合锚钉有助于避免术中并发症,并实现力量几乎完全恢复的稳定状况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验