Baer John S, Garrett Sharon B, Beadnell Blair, Wells Elizabeth A, Peterson Peggy L
Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105-4631, USA.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2007 Dec;21(4):582-6. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.4.582.
A brief motivational intervention with 117 homeless adolescents was evaluated using a randomized design and 3-month follow-up. The intervention was designed to raise youths' concerns about their substance use, support harm reduction, and encourage greater service utilization at a collaborating agency. The study was designed to strengthen initial promising results of an earlier study (P. L. Peterson, J. S. Baer, E. A. Wells, J. A. Ginzler, & S. B. Garrett, 2006). Several modifications in the clinical protocol were included to enhance engagement with the intervention. Analyses revealed no significant benefits for intervention participants when homeless youths' substance use rates were compared with those of control participants. Service utilization during the intervention period increased for those receiving the intervention but returned to baseline levels at follow-up. Participants reported overall reductions in substance use over time. Differences between sampling methods for the current and previous study are discussed, as are the limitations of brief interventions with this population. Future research needs to elucidate mechanisms of change and service engagement for highly vulnerable youth.
采用随机设计和3个月随访对117名无家可归青少年进行了简短动机干预评估。该干预旨在提高青少年对其物质使用问题的关注,支持减少伤害,并鼓励他们更多地利用合作机构的服务。本研究旨在强化早期一项研究(P.L.彼得森、J.S.贝尔、E.A.韦尔斯、J.A.金兹勒和S.B.加勒特,2006年)初步取得的有前景的结果。临床方案中进行了多项修改,以增强对干预的参与度。分析表明,将无家可归青少年的物质使用率与对照组参与者的使用率进行比较时,干预参与者没有显著受益。接受干预的人在干预期间的服务利用率有所提高,但在随访时又回到了基线水平。参与者报告称,随着时间的推移,物质使用总体上有所减少。讨论了当前研究和先前研究抽样方法之间的差异,以及针对这一人群的简短干预的局限性。未来的研究需要阐明高危青少年的改变机制和服务参与情况。