Curtis L E, Kallenbach R L, Roberts C A
Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2008 Mar;86(3):780-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0525. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
In a 2-yr study, we evaluated the effect of different forage allocations on the performance of lactating beef cows and their calves grazing stockpiled tall fescue. Allocations of stockpiled tall fescue at 2.25, 3.00, 3.75, and 4.50% of cow-calf pair BW/d were set as experimental treatments. Conventional hay-feeding was also evaluated as a comparison to grazing stockpiled tall fescue. The experiment had a randomized complete block design with 3 replications and was divided into 3 phases each year. From early December to late February (phase 1) of each year, cows and calves grazed stockpiled tall fescue or were fed hay in the treatments described above. Immediately after phase 1, cows and calves were commingled and managed as a single group until weaning in April (phase 2) so that residual effects could be documented. Residual effects on cows were measured after the calves were weaned in April until mid-July (phase 3). During phase 1 of both years, apparent DMI of cow-calf pairs allocated stockpiled tall fescue at 4.50% of BW/d was 31% greater (P < 0.01) than those allocated 2.25% of BW/d. As allocation of stockpiled tall fescue increased from 2.25 to 4.50% of cow-calf BW/d, pasture utilization fell (P < 0.01) from 84 +/- 7% to 59 +/- 7%. During phase 1 of both years, cow BW losses increased linearly (P < 0.02) as forage allocations decreased, although the losses in yr 1 were almost double (P < 0.01) those in yr 2. During phases 2 and 3, few differences were noted across treatment groups, such that by the end of phase 3, cow BW in all treatments did not differ either year (P > 0.40). Calf ADG in phase 1 increased linearly (P < 0.01) with forage allocation (y = 0.063x + 0.513; R(2) = 0.91). However, calf gain per hectare decreased linearly (P < 0.01) as stockpiled tall fescue allocations increased (y = -26.5x + 212; R(2) = 0.97) such that gain per hectare for cow-calf pairs allocated stockpiled tall fescue at 4.50% BW/d was nearly 40% less (P < 0.01) than for those allocated 2.25% of BW/d. Allocating cow-calf pairs stockpiled tall fescue at 2.25% of BW/d likely optimizes its use; because cow body condition is easily regained in the subsequent spring and summer months, less forage is used during winter, and calf gain per hectare is maximized.
在一项为期两年的研究中,我们评估了不同牧草分配量对泌乳期肉牛及其犊牛放牧贮藏高羊茅的生产性能的影响。将按犊牛对体重的2.25%、3.00%、3.75%和4.50%分配贮藏高羊茅作为实验处理。还评估了传统干草饲喂作为放牧贮藏高羊茅的对照。该实验采用随机完全区组设计,重复3次,每年分为3个阶段。每年12月初至2月底(第1阶段),母牛和犊牛按上述处理放牧贮藏高羊茅或饲喂干草。第1阶段结束后,母牛和犊牛混合饲养并作为一个群体管理至4月断奶(第2阶段),以便记录残留效应。在4月犊牛断奶后至7月中旬(第3阶段)测量对母牛的残留效应。在两年的第1阶段,按体重的4.50%分配贮藏高羊茅的犊牛对的表观干物质摄入量比按体重的2.25%分配的高31%(P<0.01)。随着贮藏高羊茅分配量从犊牛对体重的2.25%增加到4.50%,牧场利用率从84±7%降至59±7%(P<0.01)。在两年的第1阶段,随着牧草分配量减少,母牛体重损失呈线性增加(P<0.02),尽管第1年的损失几乎是第2年的两倍(P<0.01)。在第2和第3阶段,各处理组之间差异不大,因此到第3阶段结束时,所有处理的母牛体重在两年中均无差异(P>0.40)。第1阶段犊牛的平均日增重随牧草分配量呈线性增加(P<0.01)(y = 0.063x + 0.513;R² = 0.91)。然而,随着贮藏高羊茅分配量增加,每公顷犊牛增重呈线性下降(P<0.01)(y = -26.5x + 212;R² = 0.97),因此按体重的4.50%分配贮藏高羊茅的犊牛对每公顷增重比按体重的2.25%分配的低近40%(P<0.01)。按犊牛对体重的2.25%分配贮藏高羊茅可能会优化其利用;因为母牛的体况在随后的春季和夏季很容易恢复,冬季使用的牧草较少,且每公顷犊牛增重最大化。