Kakar Sanjeev, Tornetta Paul, Schemitsch Emil H, Swiontkowski Marc F, Koval Kenneth, Hanson Beate P, Jönsson Anders, Bhandari Mohit
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, USA.
J Trauma. 2007 Sep;63(3):641-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000249296.55245.97.
To identify current opinions among orthopedic traumatologists relating to technical aspects of internal fixation and arthroplasty for patients with femoral neck fractures.
We developed and administered a survey to orthopedic surgeons who were members of the Orthopedic Trauma Association and European clinics affiliated with AO International (Davos, Switzerland). Surgeons reported preferences in specific aspects of the surgical technique for internal fixation as well as arthroplasty. Each surgeon received either a mailed package (7-page survey, a personalized cover letter, and a stamped return envelope) or an email with a link to the same survey on the Internet with an identification code. At 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks after the initial mailing, we remailed the questionnaire to all nonresponders.
Of the 442 surgeons who were sent the questionnaire, 298 (68%) responded. The typical respondent was a North American aged more than 40 years, in academic practice, supervised residents, had fellowship training in trauma, and worked in a low-volume center. Among surgeons who treated displaced femoral neck fractures with arthroplasty, significant disparities existed in terms of the type of anesthesia (51% preferring general anesthesia), surgical approach (47% used posterior approach), and placement of unipolar implants (50%). Surgeons tended to agree on the use of cement fixation (69%), repairing the capsule (80%), and not using a drain postoperatively (68%). Surgeons who preferentially treated hip fractures with internal fixation tended to have a lack of consensus in terms of what constituted acceptable surgical delays (43% allowing greater than 48 hours) and which screw configuration to use, with more than half using a triangle with base inferior construct. Surgeons tended to agree on the use of closed fracture reduction techniques (69%), three cannulated screws (73%), and did not routinely perform a capsulotomy (80%) or aspirate the fracture hematoma (90%). Within both treatment groups (internal fixation and arthroplasty), surgeons tended to agree on the use of perioperative antibiotics (>92%), thromboprophylaxis (98%), and postoperative weight bearing status (>87%).
A general lack of consensus exists among orthopedic trauma surgeons in the management of displaced femoral neck fractures. With an ever-growing emphasis upon the practice of evidence-based medicine, we have demonstrated several disparities in the technical aspects of fixation and perioperative care likely caused by a general lack of available evidence. We recommend the need for future research and large collaborative efforts.
确定骨科创伤外科医生对于股骨颈骨折患者内固定和关节置换技术方面的当前观点。
我们设计并向骨科创伤协会成员以及与AO国际(瑞士达沃斯)相关的欧洲诊所的骨科外科医生发放了一份调查问卷。外科医生报告了他们在手术技术的特定方面对于内固定以及关节置换的偏好。每位外科医生要么收到一个邮寄包裹(7页调查问卷、一封个性化的求职信以及一个贴好邮票的回邮信封),要么收到一封带有互联网上相同调查问卷链接及识别码的电子邮件。在首次邮寄后的6周、12周和18周,我们将问卷重新邮寄给所有未回复者。
在被发送问卷的442名外科医生中,298名(68%)做出了回复。典型的回复者是一名年龄超过40岁的北美医生,从事学术工作,指导住院医师,接受过创伤专科培训,且在一个手术量较少的中心工作。在采用关节置换治疗移位型股骨颈骨折的外科医生中,在麻醉类型(51%更喜欢全身麻醉)、手术入路(47%采用后入路)以及单极植入物的放置(50%)方面存在显著差异。外科医生在使用骨水泥固定(69%)、修复关节囊(80%)以及术后不使用引流管(68%)方面倾向于达成共识。优先采用内固定治疗髋部骨折的外科医生在可接受的手术延迟时间(43%允许超过48小时)以及使用哪种螺钉构型方面缺乏共识,超过一半的人使用基底在下的三角形构型。外科医生在使用闭合骨折复位技术(69%)、三根空心螺钉(73%)以及不常规进行关节囊切开术(80%)或抽吸骨折血肿(90%)方面倾向于达成共识。在两个治疗组(内固定和关节置换)中,外科医生在围手术期使用抗生素(>92%)、血栓预防(98%)以及术后负重状态(>87%)方面倾向于达成共识。
骨科创伤外科医生在移位型股骨颈骨折的治疗方面普遍缺乏共识。随着对循证医学实践的日益重视,我们已经证明在固定技术和围手术期护理的技术方面存在一些差异,这可能是由于普遍缺乏可用证据所致。我们建议未来需要开展研究并进行大规模合作努力。