van Amstel Mariëtte, de Neve Willem, de Kraker Joop, Glasbergen Pieter
Athena Institute of the Free University Amsterdam, The Netherland.
Ambio. 2007 Nov;36(7):551-8. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[551:aotpoe]2.0.co;2.
We conducted a study to assess to what extent current ecolabels contain standards that stimulate conservation and sustainable use of on-farm biodiversity of agricultural landscapes (agrobiodiversity). First, we developed an agrobiodiversity management yardstick to assess and compare the labeling schemes of ecolabels for arable farming. Key characteristics of the yardstick are the five levels linking the abstract notion of agrobiodiversity management to concrete measures on a farm and its foundation upon expert judgment regarding the effect of farming practices on agrobiodiversity. Several environmental themes, among them agrobiodiversity management, are regulated through the standards of labeling schemes of ecolabels. With the aid of this yardstick, the labeling schemes were scrutinized and the number, average efficacy, and compulsory nature of relevant standards was determined for 10 categories of farm management. The results show that all examined ecolabels contain at least some standards that stimulate conservation and sustainable use of agrobiodiversity, but there are large differences between the labels. We consider the results of the five ecolabels to be insufficient to warrant their usefulness as a governance strategy that the Dutch government could refer to and depend on as part of a national agrobiodiversity policy to stimulate agrobiodiversity.
我们开展了一项研究,以评估当前的生态标签在多大程度上包含能够促进农业景观中农场生物多样性(农业生物多样性)保护和可持续利用的标准。首先,我们制定了一个农业生物多样性管理衡量标准,以评估和比较用于耕地种植的生态标签的标签方案。该衡量标准的关键特征是五个级别,它们将农业生物多样性管理的抽象概念与农场的具体措施联系起来,并且其基于专家对农业实践对农业生物多样性影响的判断。包括农业生物多样性管理在内的几个环境主题,是通过生态标签的标签方案标准进行规范的。借助这个衡量标准,对标签方案进行了审查,并确定了10类农场管理的相关标准的数量、平均效力和强制性。结果表明,所有检查的生态标签都至少包含一些能够促进农业生物多样性保护和可持续利用的标准,但各标签之间存在很大差异。我们认为这五个生态标签的结果不足以证明它们作为荷兰政府可以参考并依赖的治理策略的有用性,而该策略是国家农业生物多样性政策中促进农业生物多样性的一部分。