Carlbom David J, Rubenfeld Gordon D
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):2525-32. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000298122.49245.d7.
To identify barriers to implementation of a written protocol for early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis in the busiest emergency departments in the United States.
Telephone survey with both quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Two busiest teaching and two busiest nonteaching emergency departments in each of the 25 most densely populated combined statistical areas in the United States.
Twenty-four physician directors and 40 nursing managers representing 53% of the 100 emergency departments surveyed.
Survey questionnaire.
Respondents identified lack of available nursing staff to perform the procedure, the inability to monitor central venous pressure in the emergency department, and challenges in identifying septic patients as the most frequent barriers. Although nurse managers and physicians identified similar barriers, nurses were more likely than physicians to list central venous catheter insertion as an important barrier (38% vs. 5%; p = .01), and physicians were more likely to endorse lack of agreement with the early goal-directed therapy resuscitation protocol (16% vs. 0%; p = .03). There were no statistically significant differences in the rankings assigned by clinicians from teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Qualitative analysis of open-ended questions identified barriers in a number of areas, including barriers to initiating the protocol process and factors that distinguish sepsis from other time-sensitive diseases in the emergency department.
Nurse managers and physician directors of busy emergency departments representing the largest urban areas in the United States identify multiple barriers to implementing time-sensitive resuscitation to patients with severe sepsis. More than half of all respondents recognized a critical shortage of nursing staff, problems in obtaining central venous pressure monitoring, and challenges in identification of patients with sepsis as the largest roadblocks to overcome in implementing early goal-directed therapy.
确定在美国最繁忙的急诊科实施严重脓毒症早期目标导向治疗书面方案的障碍。
采用定量和定性分析的电话调查。
美国25个人口最密集的综合统计区中,每个区最繁忙的两家教学急诊科和两家最繁忙的非教学急诊科。
24位急诊科主任和40位护理部经理,占所调查的100家急诊科的53%。
调查问卷。
受访者认为,缺乏执行该治疗步骤的护理人员、在急诊科无法监测中心静脉压以及识别脓毒症患者存在困难是最常见的障碍。尽管护理部经理和急诊科主任指出了类似的障碍,但护士比医生更倾向于将中心静脉导管置入列为重要障碍(38%对5%;p = 0.01),而医生更倾向于认可对早期目标导向治疗复苏方案缺乏共识(16%对0%;p = 0.03)。教学医院和非教学医院的临床医生给出的排名无统计学显著差异。对开放式问题的定性分析确定了多个领域的障碍,包括启动方案流程的障碍以及急诊科中脓毒症与其他时间敏感型疾病的鉴别因素。
代表美国最大城市地区的繁忙急诊科的护理部经理和急诊科主任确定了对严重脓毒症患者实施时间敏感型复苏存在多种障碍。超过一半的受访者认为护理人员严重短缺、获取中心静脉压监测存在问题以及识别脓毒症患者存在困难是实施早期目标导向治疗需克服的最大障碍。