Suppr超能文献

使用(自助法)蒙特卡罗技术验证生物气溶胶数据的解释标准。

Verifying interpretive criteria for bioaerosol data using (bootstrap) Monte Carlo techniques.

作者信息

Spicer R Christopher, Gangloff Harry

机构信息

WCD Consultants, Pennington, New Jersey 08534, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008 Feb;5(2):85-93. doi: 10.1080/15459620701804717.

Abstract

A number of interpretive descriptors have been proposed for bioaerosol data due to the lack of health-based numerical standards, but very few have been verified as to their ability to describe a suspect indoor environment. Culturable and nonculturable (spore trap) sampling using the bootstrap version of Monte Carlo simulation (BMC) at several sites during 2003-2006 served as a source of indoor and outdoor data to test various criteria with regard to their variability in characterizing an indoor or outdoor environment. The purpose was to gain some insight for the reliability of some of the interpretive criteria in use as well as to demonstrate the utility of BMC methods as a generalized technique for validation of various interpretive criteria for bioaerosols. The ratio of nonphylloplane (NP) fungi (total of Aspergillus and Penicillium) to phylloplane (P) fungi (total of Cladosporium, Alternaria, and Epicoccum), or NP/P, is a descriptor that has been used to identify "dominance" of nonphylloplane fungi (NP/P > 1.0), assumed to be indicative of a problematic indoor environment. However, BMC analysis of spore trap and culturable bioaerosol data using the NP/P ratio identified frequent dominance by nonphylloplane fungi in outdoor air. Similarly, the NP/P descriptor indicated dominance of nonphylloplane fungi in buildings with visible mold growth and/or known water intrusion with a frequency often in the range of 0.5 Fixed numerical criteria for spore trap data of 900 and 1300 spores/m(3) for total spores and 750 Aspergillus/Penicillium spores/m(3) exhibited similar variability, as did ratios of nonphylloplane to total fungi, phylloplane to total fungi, and indoor/outdoor ratios for total fungal spores. Analysis of bioaerosol data by BMC indicates that numerical levels or descriptors based on dominance of certain fungi are unreliable as criteria for characterizing a given environment. The utility of BMC analysis lies in its generalized application to test mathematically the validity of any given descriptor or criterion for bioaerosols, which can be an important tool in quantifying the uncertainty in interpreting bioaerosol data.

摘要

由于缺乏基于健康的数值标准,人们针对生物气溶胶数据提出了许多解释性描述符,但很少有描述符在描述可疑室内环境的能力方面得到验证。2003年至2006年期间,在多个地点使用蒙特卡罗模拟的自展版本(BMC)进行可培养和不可培养(孢子捕获)采样,以此作为室内和室外数据的来源,来测试各种标准在表征室内或室外环境时的变异性。目的是深入了解一些现行解释性标准的可靠性,并证明BMC方法作为一种通用技术在验证生物气溶胶各种解释性标准方面的实用性。非叶表面(NP)真菌(曲霉属和青霉属的总和)与叶表面(P)真菌(枝孢属、链格孢属和附球菌属的总和)的比率,即NP/P,是一个已被用于识别非叶表面真菌“优势”(NP/P>1.0)的描述符,假定这表明室内环境存在问题。然而,使用NP/P比率对孢子捕获和可培养生物气溶胶数据进行的BMC分析表明,室外空气中非叶表面真菌经常占优势。同样,NP/P描述符表明,在有可见霉菌生长和/或已知有水侵入的建筑物中,非叶表面真菌占优势的频率通常在0.5左右。总孢子的孢子捕获数据的固定数值标准为900和1300个孢子/立方米,曲霉属/青霉属孢子为750个孢子/立方米,其变异性相似,非叶表面真菌与总真菌的比率、叶表面真菌与总真菌的比率以及总真菌孢子的室内/室外比率也是如此。BMC对生物气溶胶数据的分析表明,基于某些真菌优势的数值水平或描述符作为表征给定环境的标准并不可靠。BMC分析的实用性在于其广泛应用,可从数学上测试生物气溶胶任何给定描述符或标准的有效性,这可能是量化解释生物气溶胶数据时不确定性的重要工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验