Postma M J, de Vries R, Welte R, Edmunds W J
Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy (GRIP), University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sex Transm Infect. 2008 Apr;84(2):152-4. doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.028043. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
The health economic concepts of dominance were reviewed on the basis of two recently published cost-effectiveness analyses on screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis, one in this journal. On the basis of dominance, some strategies may be deleted from the set options from which to choose. The two investigated studies were from the United Kingdom and The Netherlands. Both studies nicely illustrate situations of so-called extended dominance in practical decision making. Extended dominance is a theoretical topic in many health-economic text books but is only scarcely encountered in daily practice. Although the concept of extended dominance is theoretical in nature, a formal analysis and explanation may help show which options under consideration are not optimal from a strictly health-economic perspective; however, these options might still be attractive policy options for other reasons.
基于最近发表的两篇关于无症状沙眼衣原体筛查的成本效益分析(其中一篇发表在本期刊上),对优势的健康经济概念进行了综述。基于优势原则,一些策略可能会从可供选择的方案集中被剔除。两项被调查的研究分别来自英国和荷兰。这两项研究都很好地说明了在实际决策中所谓的扩展优势情况。扩展优势在许多健康经济教科书中是一个理论话题,但在日常实践中很少遇到。尽管扩展优势的概念本质上是理论性的,但形式化的分析和解释可能有助于表明,从严格的健康经济角度来看,哪些正在考虑的方案并非最优;然而,由于其他原因,这些方案可能仍然是有吸引力的政策选择。