de Lind van Wijngaarden Robert A F, van Rijn Leendert, Hagen E Christiaan, Watts Richard A, Gregorini Gina, Tervaert Jan Willem Cohen, Mahr Alfred D, Niles John L, de Heer Emile, Bruijn Jan A, Bajema Ingeborg M
Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jan;3(1):237-52. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03550807. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
The first description of what is now known as antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated necrotizing vasculitis appeared more than 140 yr ago. Since then, many aspects of the pathogenic pathway have been elucidated, indicating the involvement of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies, but why antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies are produced in the first place remains unknown. Over the years, many hypotheses have emerged addressing the etiology of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody production, but no exclusive factor or set of factors can so far be held responsible. Herein is reviewed the most influential hypotheses regarding the causes of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis with the aim of placing in an epidemiologic background the different hypotheses that are centered on environmental and genetic influences.
目前所知的抗中性粒细胞胞浆自身抗体相关坏死性血管炎的首次描述出现在140多年前。从那时起,致病途径的许多方面已被阐明,表明抗中性粒细胞胞浆自身抗体参与其中,但抗中性粒细胞胞浆自身抗体最初为何产生仍不清楚。多年来,出现了许多关于抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体产生病因的假说,但迄今为止,没有一个单独的因素或一组因素能被认定为此负责。本文回顾了关于抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关血管炎病因的最具影响力的假说,目的是将以环境和遗传影响为中心的不同假说置于流行病学背景中。