Kim Jee Young, Burnett Richard T, Neas Lucas, Thurston George D, Schwartz Joel, Tolbert Paige E, Brunekreef Bert, Goldberg Mark S, Romieu Isabelle
National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;17 Suppl 2:S83-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500623.
Air pollution epidemiologic research has often utilized ambient air concentrations measured from centrally located monitors as a surrogate measure of exposure to these pollutants. Associations between these ambient concentrations and health outcomes such as lung function, hospital admissions, and mortality have been examined in short- and long-term cohort studies as well as in time-series and case-crossover studies. The issues related to interpreting the observed associations of ambient air pollutants with health outcomes were discussed at the US EPA sponsored workshop on December 13 and 14, 2006 in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. The second session of this workshop focused on the following topics: (1) statistical methodology and study designs that may improve understanding of multipollutant health effects; (2) ambient concentrations as surrogate measures of pollutant mixtures; and (3) source-focused epidemiologic research. New methodology and approaches to better distinguish the effects of individual pollutants include multicity hierarchical modeling and the use of case-crossover analysis to control for copollutants. An alternative approach is to examine the mixture as a whole using principal component analysis. Another important consideration is to what extent the observed health associations are attributable to individual pollutants, which are often from common sources and are correlated, versus the pollutant mixtures that the pollutants are representing. For example, several ambient air concentrations, such as particulate matter mass, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide, may be serving as surrogate measures of motor vehicle exhaust. Source apportionment analysis is one method that may allow further advancement in understanding the source components that contribute to multipollutant health effects.
空气污染流行病学研究常常利用位于中心位置的监测器所测得的环境空气浓度,作为接触这些污染物的替代指标。在短期和长期队列研究以及时间序列和病例交叉研究中,已经考察了这些环境浓度与诸如肺功能、住院率和死亡率等健康结果之间的关联。2006年12月13日至14日在美国北卡罗来纳州教堂山由美国环境保护局主办的研讨会上,讨论了与解读所观察到的环境空气污染物与健康结果之间的关联有关的问题。本次研讨会的第二场会议聚焦于以下主题:(1)可能增进对多种污染物健康影响理解的统计方法和研究设计;(2)作为污染物混合物替代指标的环境浓度;以及(3)以来源为重点的流行病学研究。更好地区分单个污染物影响的新方法和途径包括多城市分层建模以及使用病例交叉分析来控制共存污染物。另一种方法是使用主成分分析来整体考察混合物。另一个重要的考虑因素是,所观察到的健康关联在多大程度上可归因于通常来自共同来源且相互关联的单个污染物, versus 污染物所代表的污染物混合物。例如,几种环境空气浓度,如颗粒物质量、二氧化氮和一氧化碳,可能作为机动车尾气的替代指标。源解析分析是一种可能有助于在理解促成多种污染物健康影响的源成分方面取得进一步进展的方法。